User talk:Janus014



Hello, Janus014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 11:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Chalukya dynasty, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The specific issue was that you changed the wording of a direct quotation in a reference, which should be absolutely avoided per MOS:PMC. Swadge2 (talk) 08:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi. Sorry, i did not notice the direct quote for that. But are the second para edits also direct quotes? Maharashtra, Goa, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh aren't in "South India". Janus014 (talk) 09:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your edits
Hi, how are you. I noticed that after editing several sub-articles with so called "improved language" edit summaries but without really adding any value to the articles, you are now messing around with Featured articles. I suggest you read your history a little better before throwing tags. Your recent edit to Western Chalukya empire is not well informed. The possibility of the Chalukya origin from Ayodhya is only a legend and is not supported by any direct inscription of literature but that fact that 90% of their inscriptions and literature are in Kannada is what historians use in claiming their Kannada origin and many citations have been provied from reliable historians. If you want to challenge this, bring out real sources to prove yourself and start a discussion. Or you could call a admin for mediation and we will take that route. Best of luck.Pied Hornbill (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


 * "But without really adding any value to the articles, you are now messing around with Featured articles. I suggest you read your history a little better before throwing tags". And who determines that? You?. With "provied"? I suggest you stop being arrogant and learn spellings before preaching to people and determining "what adds "real value". Your claims of "Kannadiga Identity" are logically fallacious, their inscription being in Kannada does not make them Kannada nationals. Do the pages of all the sultanates (including Mughals) in India describe them as "Persian" in the first sentence solely on the basis of the pre-dominant language of literature. Their self identification matters more. I suggest you also learn some basic logic. Such attributions of identity let alone as weak "Kannadiga" going against contemporary self-identifications are not just not standard but are also logically fallacious. Janus014 (talk) 07:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I suggest you use your logic more thoughtfully. Just because there is a legend that their ancestors are from Ayodhya does not make them Ayodhyan's either, for everybody's ancestors are from somewhere and their ancestors from somewhere else. Use your common sense. The Ancestors of the Marathas Bhonsle clan is known to be from the Karnataka Hoysalas as the word Bhonsle is known to be a corruption of the word Hoysala (R.C Dhere). Does that make the Marathas Kannadigas?.Pied Hornbill (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Since you are a new user who is still learning to edit on wikipedia, I suggest you not get into a edit war and get blocked. I suggest to engage an admin to mediate this issue and I will provide you all the data you need to prove the point. This is only an advice.Pied Hornbill (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Are you threatening? You are being logically fallacious, forget about "data". You could provide all the "data". Janus014 (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Look who is being thick. In your revert edit summary you wrote:

"Stop conflating non-standard logically fallacious identity attributions with evidence. Claims of "Kannadiga Identity" are logically fallacious, their inscription being in Kannada does not make them Kannada nationals. Do the pages of all the sultanates (including Mughals) in India describe them as "Persian" in the first sentence solely on the basis of language? Stop being thick".

My response: How hypocrtical of you because you are the one who was throwing around the word "Persio-Turkish invasion" replacing it every time the word "Muslim invasion" was used in many stub articles. How did you figure out that every commander who invaded India had ancestors who were only Persio-Turkish?. Call an admin and we will go that route.Pied Hornbill (talk) 15:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * "Persio-Turkish" invasion. Are you blind? They are Turko-Persians, look at their own Wikipedia pages on their origins. Turko-Persian is a civilization-culture, i suggest you actually read the linked article instead of being thick and blind. "Commanders", yes totally. Janus014 (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I said it was an advice, but your combative tone is all too familiar with the scores of newbys I have come across, who come and go from wikipedia without making any valuable contribution. I suggest you take an objective approach to your editing. Browbeating and challenging other editors, especially seniors, never pays off on this platform. Best of luck.Pied Hornbill (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You accuse me of things you yourself are guilty of including the "combative" tone with the arrogance of an "experienced" with the self-aggrandizing claim of making "valuable contributions". I suggest you do the same and start making logical arguments rather than arguments by authority which are not objective. Best of luck to both of us, may you become objective and rational. Janus014 (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kapilendra Deva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gauda. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.32.26.193 (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * You have to be more specific. I'm not adding any poorly sourced or unsourced content. You don't even have an account, you seem to have just created account to do things that you accuse me of. Do you want to be blocked from editing? Janus014 (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yashovarman. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I vandalized? Anon troll edits from 2 different IPs actaully vandalized. Anon IPs also threatened blocking. Are you those anon IPs, comrade?
 * "Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree"? Are these comrade and 2 clone anon IPs? Janus014 (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.167.164 (talk) 04:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahendrapala I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhoja II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)