User talk:Jarc2009

SG
The problem isn't accuracy - it's notability. That particular variant is not independently notable. Ironholds (talk) 16:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Ironholds (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Note
Do not delete references to heavy metal from AC/DC related articles. The band are well referenced in their connection to the genre. It has been discussed thoroughly by several veteran Wikipedia editors. And its inclusion has been agreed upon. See: WP:CON and WP:V. If you continue to blank links to heavy metal from AC/DC related pages you will be blocked from editing. The Real Libs-speak politely 14:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Userpage Comment
"I am an AC/DC fanatic, so DON'T question my knowledge on anything to do with AC/DC! I don't need a damned reference, because I know that it's true!"


 * Just so you know, this attitude is entirely incompatible with WP:RS and WP:NOR, two policies that are absolutely NOT suggestions, regardless of your 'fanatic' status. We place more stock in the opinions and analysis of professional music critics than fans. --King Öomie 15:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)