User talk:Jaremy Brown/sandbox

Article Evaluation
In this Article, the lead introductory sentence is satisfactory, but is a little boring. It doesn't quite hook me. It does give a brief description of the articles main sections. I didn't read anything in the lead that I didn't find in the overall present article. finally I found the lead to be concise. The articles content of the article seems relevant, but in the beginning it states that the article has multiple issues. With that I don't believe the article is up to date. It states it needs attention from an expert in Philosophy. Im not sure if content is missing but if that warning states the following than im sure somethings are out of place or missing. Although the article is missing some things, it's very much balanced and neutral. There is not any claims made that states a biased view. The viewpoints on the other hand seem very straight forward, lots of information, nothing overly detailed and pointless. There are no points in the article that seem to make me want to chose a side or favor in a certain position.

The article in fact states it needs a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because It has insufficient inline citation. Most of the highlighted links work though. There are sources at the bottom of the article, but I'm not sure you can trust them.

This article is very well written, very informal. I don't know whether its factual or not because of the warning of its multiple issues. In terms of grammar I found very few issues and zero spelling errors.

The article has zero images. I don't think there can be, in its defense Im the only one in the talk area of the page and it seems I'm the last to edit it. I don't believe it is apart of any wiki-projects

This article has a lot going for it, it well balanced and states its info clearly. I believe it just needs some fine editing and some scholarly sources. This pages need an export in the subject to make it more viable. That alone will make it a solid wiki page.

Ethics in technology summary
When taking a look into this topic, we have to understand that this is a topic of problems dealing with technology. We often see technology as a helping hand or better yet a path to a better world, before any of that we have to lay down the ethics with in it so we can have a moral underground on where to start.

As stated in the wiki, ethics in technology simply starts with a right in wrong in the creation. Does this help or destroy something we hold valuable. You can see a lot of these discussions involved in the creation of weapons. Technology that can give any person power over the next is something ethics must be added to. Thats basically the gist of what this article was speaking about but I would like to talk about the different types of Technology Ethics.

They're a multitude of places we can start but I believe there are a few that we should mention that are more important than the rest. Starting with Access rights, this involves the right to importing technology as a right. We see this a lot in the news, especially in schools for kids that don't have technology and are forced to live in a society who prices technology asa luxury but treats it as necessity. Next is Existential Risk, this is like what we were talking about in the paragraph before. This deals with the idea that the technology could pose as a threat like weapons. Lastly I would like to speak of Security, this is a really big one because this involves our constitutional rights to privacy and protection. This to me is far more important because this includes everyone. Ethics in Technology doesn't get the attention it needs because it plays a big hand in everything. Technology will inevitably will run this new age, but we have to understand the grounds of its creations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_technology