User talk:Jarhed/Archive 4

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of John Smelcer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Smelcer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Smelcer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Bologna
Hello, Jarhed. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. P.S. This is in response to your comment in Articles for deletion/Anthony Bologna. I don't know if it's common for an editor to "police a deletion discussion", but I was left with no choice. ScottyBerg removed my "friendly notice" from his talk page and dumped a few more disruptive comments right after that. Thanks for looking into it. --Fayerman (talk) 23:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Gilgamesh in the Outback BLP Noticeboard
Left you some more background information. We really need help from a unbiased editor.98.218.161.68 (talk) 04:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

User removing the resolved tag
A user removed the Resolved tag you added, along with another tag. Will you restore these tags and explain to the user (User:Violet Fae) that this discussion is indeed resolved? I also commented there about it. 119.167.225.1 (talk) 00:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * There's also this, showing another editor agreeing that the matter is resolved and me thanking him for that. 119.167.225.1 (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey, thanks...that's what I was talking about with the "bibiliography section", I do that on most of my articles. See this one I'm working on: John C. Colt. I was pulled into Moore as I'm coordinator of the firearms project, that was associated with it for some reason. I only had a few gripes there. One, it stated Moore was a "lifelong member", he wasn't. He got a Life Membership after Columbine for other reasons...that has since been cleaned up. The other, involving the cites was his "wanting to be a priest and joining seminary" and it was worded to sound as if he changed his mind the day before ordination. The fact was he dropped out of High School Prep Seminary after a year. The sourcing on that piece is all over the place, but I was being called on the carpet for using a Harvard cite. No biggie, just some time wasted. Thanks again, Jarhed!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC) PS did you serve? If so "Ooh-Rah!", if not...Oh Well. :) --Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Consensus of the Heroes in Hell Merge - Did it include all of the Books and Stories?
According to my memory during the Lawyers in Hell AfD discussion about merging the Heroes in Hell articles into one large article, it was decided ALL the articles were to be merged. No mention was made of leaving any of the articles separate.

When I went to merge the one remaining article, one editor got really upset saying that the merge discussion did not include this article, Gilgamesh in the Outback. I believe that the consensus was for all articles. The admin who is currently handling the dispute was not involved at the time, and needs to see a show of hands. If you have any opinion on the issue could you please make your opinion known at Talk:Gilgamesh in the Outback. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Iran Contra Scandal
Hello, I was the translator for the Nicaraguan Contra (ARDE,FDN,RN,UNO,& others)in Costa Rica for several years and especially during the years preceding and during the Iran Contra Scandal. I have a lot of information and even documents that I have never published concerning the drug-trafficking that they were participating in during that time. I would like to hear your advice about how to present this information and maybe scanned documents, on Wikipedia. I still have original documents from the Contra, including signed notes from the Nicaraguan pilots who were being trained by the CIA to fly cocaine to the US in the mid-80's. Please reply to me at: @yahoo.com WHL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.15.0.216 (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote#Trivial_hatnote_links
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote. KarlB (talk) 18:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Help with Wiki-Bullies; your opinion would be greatly appreciated!
Hello, I am fighting to try to establish a fair and accurate page for Steven Crowder who is an avid supporter of Americans for Prosperity, but feel I am being Wiki-bullied by editors who have a personal dislike for him and want to include libelous/POV comments about him. I would appreciate anyone taking a look since we've reached a deadlock and the Wikiguide suggests having a 3rd party look at it to try to find a resolution. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! JohnKAndersen (talk) 06:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)JohnKAndersen