User talk:Jaridgway/sandbox

=Evaluations=

1/30/2018 Evaluation by Ctardif5

 * Points: 27/40
 * Grade: 67.5%

Spelling/Grammar
Nearly Meets Standard The original spelling "principal" is correct in this context, and not "principle". I also would not have removed "run by", as that specifically indicates that the identified organization oversees the public transit system...this is merely suggestion and please feel free to tell my why you disagree! These were the only issues in this category and were minor but, considering the very limited amount of edited content, they weigh more heavily.

Language
Meets Standard

Organization
Nearly Meets Standard Due to the limited amount of content edited, there was no ability to identify organization, apart from sentence structure and presentation.

Coding
Exceeds Standard

Validity
Meets Standard There is no invalid information, but there also appears to be no original content.

Completion
"Standard?" I cannot find any original or citations that were added by you. The most recently added citation was in 2017. Please inform me if I am missing somewhere else that you documented sources. It also seems that less than an adequate amount of work was done, as only a few minor grammar changes were made. I encourage you to consider this before submitting a final draft so you can get a good grade from the instructor!

Relevance
Exceeds Standard No new information was added, so technically no irrelevant information is present in your edit.

Evaluations
=Evaluations=

1/31/2018 Evaluation by Nikki_sato

 * Points: 39/40
 * Grade: 97.5%

Spelling/Grammar
Meets Standard Nice choice of words, and it flows very well for me,

Language
Meets Standard

Organization
Meets Standard Liked how you arranged the paragraphs or transportation in the order, like buses and trams/rails, transporation that tourists would use, and locals.

Coding
Meets Standard

Validity
Meets Standard I'm curious on where you found that the information about car without permits are allowed to enter certain hours? do you have sources

Completion
"Meets Standard"

Relevance
Meets Standard

2/27/2018 Evaluation by Ctardif5

 * Points: 39/40
 * Grade: 97.5%

Spelling/Grammar
Meets Standard Some improvements to the sentence structure and grammar used would be the primary focus for improvement. Good overall.

Language
Meets Standard

Organization
Nearly Meets Standard Structure would be improved if each bullet point was instead the name of the museum. It is not incorrect as it is, but in your efforts to improve the page and not have the "Museum" only be a list, the bullet points should be replaced with a better way to identify the subject of each section you have added.

Coding
Exceeds Standard

Validity
Meets Standard

Completion
"Nearly Meets Standard" Although you have included the required number of sources, I would encourage you to add a bit more content, if you can find some about the other museums. This will increase the likelihood that the grader will treat you well in this section.

Relevance
Exceeds Standard The information that was added is very relevant and seemingly helpful to the page.

2/28/2018 Evaluation by Nikki_sato

 * Points: 39/40
 * Grade: 97.5%

Spelling/Grammar
Meets Standard Good job overall!

Language
Meets Standard

Organization
Nearly Meets Standard the Museum list could be improved, by sectioning it off under a header or leading to another wikipedia site with more content on that specific museum?

Coding
Exceeds Standard Awesome job!

Validity
Meets Standard

Completion
"Nearly Meets Standard" You've completed the minimum 10 citations sources, I'm a little confused on the list of museums, maybe put it under a header?

Relevance
Exceeds Standard The information that was added is very relevant and seemingly helpful to the page.