User talk:Jarkeld/archive5

verifiability policy Re:List of materials science conferences
Hi, I've added in a couple of references to indicate importance of meetings in the list (demonstration of >15K attendees for MRS meetings, and importance to major research network), is there anything else that should to be added to cover the verifiability requirements? Thanks - Hourahine (talk) 01:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Basically as another reviewer has stated: more coverage in reliable sources. Jarkeld (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

I need help
Hi Jarkeld.

You've reviewed my article twice now & rejected it twice. Will you help so that I can get my article up??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roreo123eurovision (talk • contribs) 21:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the list will never be viable as a standalone article. Perhaps merging some of the more famous people into the Songfestival article itself is a better solution. Jarkeld (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Leguanism
Hi Jarkeld

You didn't approve my article about "Leguanism". I created the word as a test for my high school students in Sweden to se if they could be critical against a word they never heard before. Is there a chance to have the article published anyway even if the word is fake? - Caaarl81 (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Not in main article space I'm afraid. Jarkeld (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Help
You are presently dealing with my submission on "The Jones Sewing Machine Co.". The numbers 1-4 have appeared above the references. Was I meant to put the (ref) tags in the text? If not, what do I do with these numbers.

Secondly, on the "Singer Sewing Machine Company" page I have added 3 pictures near the bottom with one more to come. Two of them are displayed but the first one will not show, although I have checked the file name and that it has uploaded. Can you spot what I am doing wrong because I carried out the same procedure for all three pictures.

Panjigally (talk) 20:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm moving the responses to this to your own talk page, Panjigally; it's better if we help you there, so that you have the links for later - and to avoid cluttering up Jarkeld's page. Cheers,  Chzz  ► 22:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Crediable source
Hi

I recerntly created a wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/My_Safe_Search and you rejected do to the fact it was not sourced. It was souced from a newspaper which sells hundred of thousands of copies per week. how is that not a crediable source. I have read your guidlines and imo it meets your source guidlines. please explain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.26.53 (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've changed the reasoning. Should have used a different criterium. Jarkeld (talk) 17:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Article Rejection
Hello, I submitted a band article that you have rejected. I would like to get some help on getting it approved. The band, Gospel Claws, that I wrote the article about has a member, Joel Marquard, from Dear and the Headlights which is band that has toured nationally and has its own wikipedia page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dear_and_the_Headlights, which has been approved. In the years since Marquard left Dear and the Headlights to form Gospel Claws, it has gained notability on its own. They have been featured on NPR All Songs Considered, Paste Magazine, charted on CMJ Top 200 and FMQB Submodern chart. They have also recorded with Bob Hoag, whose wikipedia page lists Gospel Claws, to produce two albums which were released on an indie record label, Common Wall Media, nationally. This is my first article and I hope to contribute further so please help me out. Thanks ! johnclaw (talk) 11:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell they don't meet WP:MUSIC's notability criteria at this time. As notability is not inherited the fact that Hoag recorded with them does not confer notability, nor that one of the members was a member of Dear and the Headlights. Jarkeld (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

article submission
hi Jarkeld

I have submitted the article for the band Capade and it was declined (Declining submission: subject appears to be a non-notable musical performer or work) The article has references to 3 reputable newspapers with reviews on the band. It also has links to two reputable music channels, Much Music and Shaw TV. The band has also charted on one of the Canadian College charts (I can insert that as well). Even without that, when I looked at the guidelines for the article to be notable it required at leas three press references. What am I doing wrong? thank you Ivan Tucakov (talk) 01:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The references are about a recording by Capade, not about Capade itself & why the band is notable. Jarkeld .alt (Talk) 01:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

MANTA Mui Ne.
Hi Jarkeld,

Thanks for reviewing my article from MANTA Mui Ne. Advice please: on how best to write about development of sailing as a new sport for Vietnam, for Wikipedia, without mentioning the developer(s)? Especially if the article is on the essential points of development to keep it short and succinct for your readers. Or not relevant at this stage for Wikipedia, for example, until Vietnam has a sailing federation accepted by ISAF and other things in the pipeline up to 2016? The Vietnam Olympic Committee asked me for help to set up the sport and i told them it is too big for me so i need to connect with others, especially as my work for them has to be probono and delayed the opening of VN's first sailing school. I understand if this is not a subject for Wikipedia or a catch 22.

All the best, Julia MANTA Mui Ne (talk) 15:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

p.s. i understand it is necessary to develop regional sailing for sailing to remain as an Olympic sport MANTA Mui Ne (talk) 15:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

N.B. Please excuse three more considerations against a wider article (which could be common to other developing countries): (i) i decided it was not fair to mention eight other organisations associated with 'Vietnam sailing development' as two (including one very well known international charter company) left the country to escape local border police bia taxes, one went bankrupt, one has yet to register and is more a drinking club with a once a year event for about ten people, one is successful for export of large boats, one makes copies of dinghy classes locally, two are about to deliver an event in mid to late March, one delivers an event every two years from outside Vietnam for large yachts (and the Vietnamese organisers did not know how best to replicate from Vietnam (which they understand should not be a problem starting with dinghies). (ii) The sails of Vietnamese junks in a north Vietnam bay are currently cosmetic and i can email you my captains' navigation training report which compares Vietnamese and local navigation standards/differences which i could not mention publically in respect of lives lost recently. I can email my captain's navigation handbook in Vietnamese and English which was 99% complete six months ago. (The final 1% design work is underway although two key assistants went on six month honeymoon, extra busy before leaving. (iii) A short article does not need to mention authority Uturns, academic v. financial leverage or other issues. I could mention the authorities i work with, however, they have not really been exposed to the international sport. Please excuse the details which are not upbeat. Please let me know if you have any questions (to juliashaw2@gmail.com if necessary so as not to overload your talk page). I still understand if it is necessary to write off this articleMANTA Mui Ne (talk) 07:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Another thought in respect of independent advice on conflict of interest (which i need to understand better): There is a chance an instructor of Olympic judges is visiting in March to help review/advise on sailing developments and may have advice on approach/need/not for this article ...if he too is not too busy as his work includes running the legal/umpiring side of sailing for the next Olympics. The timing could coincide with editing assistance required for a six week backlog mentioned on WikipediaMANTA Mui Ne (talk) 07:31, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I have tried to clean it up a bit, but I don't really know where to start. It's not really structured properly, the gallery does nothing, the external links are all over the place. Perhaps if you'd take a look at: Your first article and WP:INCITE you can try to attempt a bit of cleanup yourself. Jarkeld (talk) 21:16, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Apologies, 1. i shall look to rewrite and restructure an article for Vietnam sailing development focused instead on a sailing federation for Vietnam, if this is created in May, by a third route recommended by Vietnam Olympic Committee, and registered with the International Sailing Federation (ISAF), as this will allow three more levels of dinghy sail training and for Vietnam to enter athletes overseas and host international events, can include windsurfing and kitesurfing developments in Vietnam which are more advanced (approx 25-30 more schools/centres across the country over the last ten years), and can support regional sailing developments or sailing as an Olympic sport 2. hope to show better understanding of conflict of interest 3. take more time on the supporting references recommended by you and Wikipedia to edit and organise the external links, gallery etc. Thanks for your time on this. MANTA Mui Ne (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

About "I need help"
Hey.

To be honest, I'm not quite sure what you mean. Could you simplify it???? Roreo123eurovision (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I see that the Eurovision page already has the table that contains the commentators. The problem with your page is that it's not suited to be an article separate of the Eurovision 2009 page. Jarkeld (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

About I need Help
How would I join them???? I'm new to this so.......... ya! Um, Jarlekd tis is for the commentators not the spokespersons! :) Roreo123eurovision (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * as far as I can see most of the info from the page you started is already included in the page. Just add the info you have and know to be correct into the proper place in the table. Jarkeld (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * If you edit the page via you can add names to the table. Basically:

|rowspan="2"| is the start of the country's line. For the next 2 | - 1 is the place to put Final or Semifinal to indicate the broadcast where the commentator commentated and the other is the place to put the name of the commentator. If there is only one, the next set of | - can be deleted. ~But use preview & exercise caution to avoid messing the table up. Jarkeld (talk) 22:57, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about the block, which I have now lifted
Um... Not really the response you deserve for limiting the vandalism, but I have now undone the block I did - and totally my mistake, as I was hitting buttons as fast as I could. Sorry about that. Did you know another editor I mistakenly blocked has become a respected admin? I hope that that is some little, um, comfort... Er, really sorry. LessHeard vanU (talk) 01:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. It's difficult to contain that kind of vandalism. Thanks for the explanation & reversal. Jarkeld (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Race Driver Grid 2
Honestly what is wrong with you? The page I've done is fine. Please explain why you want this page deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamcad01 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I have explained it at the AfD: no official anouncement was made at the website for Codemasters: only some forum posts and 1 or 2 other sources that are possibly not reliable sources. Jarkeld .alt (Talk) 11:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

ESRB
Seriously the ESRB is strict — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamcad01 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Then you won't have any problems citing the sources to support the claim. Until then I'm removing it again. Jarkeld .alt (Talk) 10:36, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

re-direct: Doug Marland/Marland Messner to Douglas Marland
re-direct: Doug Marland/Marland Messner (birth name) to Douglas Marland —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.105.49 (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Marland Messner created as a redirect. Do you have sources that support Doug Marland as a name that was used frequently to address him? Jarkeld (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Doug Marland
Many cast & crew called him Doug Marland (re-direct of Douglas Marland),, , , , ,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.105.49 (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jarkeld (talk) 20:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about the block, which I have now lifted
Um... Not really the response you deserve for limiting the vandalism, but I have now undone the block I did - and totally my mistake, as I was hitting buttons as fast as I could. Sorry about that. Did you know another editor I mistakenly blocked has become a respected admin? I hope that that is some little, um, comfort... Er, really sorry. LessHeard vanU (talk) 01:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. It's difficult to contain that kind of vandalism. Thanks for the explanation & reversal. Jarkeld (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

deleted submission
Hi, I would really like to know why my submission om Mike Pagan, has been deleted, apparently for the subject not being notable enough, however there is a similar page on Roger Harrop who is equally "not notable" that has been acceptedCharlie Jones (talk) 11:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * For the first step please read: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS on why that argument is invalid.
 * Secondly, the article does not signify why we should have an article on him.
 * Lastly, no reliable sources, independent of the subject, were cited, so even if there was a claim to notability, we still can't accept the submission.
 * I took a look the page you mentioned: there is a claim to notability, only there are no reliable sources cited. This will be corrected soon.
 * Btw: the article on Harrop wasn't made via the Afc process & your Afc article hasn't been deleted, just declined. Jarkeld (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jarkeld, Thanks for the explanation, I am new to this, I will have another look at it. Just one more question, you say the article on Harrop wasn't made via the Afc process, How was it made then, what other way is there? Charlie Jones (talk) 10:08, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It was created in main article space. When you search for a certain subject and it does not exist, for example: there is a text mentioning that you can create the article yourself: "You may create the page "Huldtoneel", but consider checking the search results below to see whether it is already covered." If you click the red linked title, you'll be taken to the page and you can start editing.
 * Any page you create must be notable as outlined in the general notability guideline and has to be verifiable via reliable sources. Jarkeld (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

declined submission
Hi Jarkeld, helpme Could you give me a better explanation on my recent submission for Mayor Nick Mason being declined? I understand the third party sources but I still think i'm missing something. Any help would be very appreciated. I willing to learn and change what is necessary. DonnieDog (talk) 03:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Donnie. Your question appears to be directed at Jarkeld specifically. When you leave a message on a person's talk page the next time they log in they get a giant orange banner across the top of every page they visit that says "you have new messages", and that banner persists until they visit their talk page. The helpme template calls users who monitor the "Wikipedians looking for help" category to your request, and so it has no use here. Note that the template is normally placed on a user's 'own talk page, given what it is for. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:24, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Independent review by Chzz
Jarkeld, I'm pretty confident you won't mind me jumping in here. I hope this is appropriate.  Chzz  ► 01:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mayor Nick Mason

DonnieDog, in the 'decline', Jarkeld left a comment regarding WP:POLITICIAN. It would be helpful if you could review that link, and specifically explain which of those 3 criteria you believe the individual meets, and explain why - particularly with regards to significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the source.


 * Refs 1, 2 and 3 are not articles about this person - although they do have a little information about him, I am not seeing "significant coverage".
 * Ref 4 does not look like a "reliable source"; it appears to be a blog-like page.
 * Ref 5 similarly does not give the impression of a reliable source; in addition, I can find no reference to "Manson" on that page.

If you are certain that there is "significant coverage", then you might consider the following suggestions;


 * You seem to misunderstand how 'references' should be used. They should not just appear at the end of the article; each part of the article needs appropriate references - directly after it. For example,

He is the former Mayor of Northfork, West Virginia. Prior to being elected mayor, Nick was a successful businessman in Northfork. He also continued to own and operate his own restaurant in Northfork during his time as Mayor. Nick has been a key political figure in McDowell County, West Virginia for many years.


 * Any information that cannot be verified does not belong on Wikipedia.


 * In addition, it needs to be neutral. Terms such as "a successful businessman" and "a key political figure" are opinion, not factual.

The current proposed article contains words that introduce bias and unsupported attributions.

My though, DonnieDog, is:. By doing so, you will gain experience in all these matters, as well as getting help from other Wikipedians. We have plenty of articles that need help. There is no deadline; the draft will not be deleted - you can always come back to it, in some weeks or months.

Best wishes,  Chzz  ► 01:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Chzz: I don't mind. Been a bit under the weather the last few days. I don't have any additions to the points you've mentioned. Jarkeld (talk) 01:04, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, cheers, get well soon  Chzz  ► 01:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Joran van der Sloot


KimChee (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thank you for taking care of the broken link during the GA review. Cheers! KimChee (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Glad to have been able to help out a little. Jarkeld (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello Jarkeld,
I thought i was trying to be a helper to some new comers since creation of userpages can be a trying task for them.But since you see no reason for that,i'll go with you then.Cheers Earlymen (talk) 04:31,19 March 2011 (UTC)

Monmouth Civic Chorus
Hi, user Jarkeld: This is user Tenorio40 writing on March 27, 2011. So far, we haven't had too much time (with taxes due April 15 and my collaborator going to Maryland 3 days this week, and I being busy all week preparing a Friday lecture on 3G Wireless Network design). So far, we have 31 references in our article, and we have found over 250 more external citations.

We have found more than 250 articles with extensive reviews of our chorus performances at local newspaper websites. My collaborator and I are engaged in a raging debate whether we should include any of 80 additional articles we have found in the New York Times. New York City is an hour away, and the 80 New York Times articles we found at www.nytimes.org are short announcements in the "New Jersey forthcoming events" section. We did not find any New York Times reviews of our performance reviews.

Clearly the New York Times is better known than "The Asbury Park Press" or "The Hub" or "The Independent". It would "look" better if we include at least a few references to show that the New York Times considers us important enough to include us in their "New Jersey forthcoming events" section. Do you agree?

But the bulk of our references should be reviews in "The Asbury Park Press", "The Hub", and other local newspapers, right? For readers who want to know what classical music reviewers wrote about our concerts, those links would be of higher value. Do you agree?

Our debate is about how many New York Times "forthcoming events" links we should list in our reference section, vs. how many local newspaper reviews we should list.

We also wonder how much is enough. We feel we can easily provide 150 newspaper review references in our reference list, if not more. Should we spend the time, effort and energy to locate and cite so many? How many are enough?

Thanks,

Richard Oppenheim, Ph.D.

Tenorio40 (talk) 21:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm still missing references for the lede and most of the history section. Those sections can be referenced to the official site i think. The lede is in a somewhat promotional tone, but I'll leave that for a second opinion by another AfC reviewer. Jarkeld (talk) 22:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

By "lede", do you mean the Introduction, i.e. the leading section? I agree. My collaborator has been focused on other sections and today I started thinking we can include references also in the History section. We can certainly also add references to the Introduction. Thanks for your comment about the tone of the introduction being somewhat promotional -- I will raise this issue with two of my collaborators on the Wiki page.

You didn't answer any of my questions - How many references are required and what is the value of New York Times references which are just "forthcoming event" notices? Perhaps the lack of a reply means there are no firm and set requirements.

Thanks.

Tenorio40 (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Forthcoming event links: perhaps better to avoid them for the most part: it hasn't happened yet and can be misconstrued as promotional. Better are the reviews in the local papers. But don't overdo it: take one or two of the reliable sources for significant events. Jarkeld (talk) 22:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I meant forthcoming event links from 1999 or 2002 or 2005. They could not possibly be misconstrued as promotional. It would prove that we are important enough to be noticed by a famous national newspaper, but even so, are the reviews in the local newspapers better? Thanks.

Tenorio40 (talk) 22:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I misread forthcoming as in later in 2011. That should be fine, as long as WP:CITEKILL is followed (an essay, not a guideline, but still relevant). Jarkeld (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello user Jarkeld, Thanks for all your help, we really appreciate it. As you can probably tell we are passionate about our chorus :-) We have a bit of a challenge: our local newspaper, the Asbury Park Press, has 139 articles mentioning MCC, but charges for access to articles ($3.99 each or 10 for $12 -- excessive in my view, but ...). I assume we shouldn't use these unless the information is in the free summary part, sigh. Thanks Gandalf Wizard (talk) 22:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * That does not particularly matter: as long as you can give the issue, page and title of the article (or for online only sources the URL etc.), it shouldn't matter that not everyone can access it freely: see WP:PAYWALL. Jarkeld (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Jarkeld, I submitted our article for a re-review a few hours ago. I see the status is "review waiting" when I go to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Tenorio40/Monmouth_Civic_Chorus but I still see the old status when I go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tenorio40/Monmouth_Civic_Chorus.

I don't really understand the difference between these two URL's.

Anyway, I just wanted to mention that I've been to Alkmeer, Edam, Enkhuizen, Den Haag, Leiden, Haarlem, etc. I dated a great lady from Amsterdam for a few years and was there almost every 2 months for 2 years. I miss eating Uitsmijter and Pannekoeken with spek. I really love Holland. Holland is Heel goed, and really lekker. Best,

Richard (user Tenorio40) 72.79.98.205 (talk) 01:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Both URL's point to the same thing: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Monmouth Civic Chorus. Both translate as the same. I'm going to take a good look at it later today & I am interested in the opinion of other reviewers.


 * Holland is heel goed. I work in Alkmaar and live in a town halfway between Alkmaar and Haarlem. Can't eat uitsmijters but love pannekoeken met spek. Jarkeld (talk) 03:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Jarkeld! I notice today that the article has been moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monmouth_Civic_Chorus I believe this means user Armbrust has approved the article, and users who search Wikipedia for "Monmouth Civic Chorus" would find it. Is this true?

User Armbrust gave the article a C-Class grade. That is disappointing. I will ask Armbrust for specific suggestions how to bring it up to the next level.

Thanks, Richard Tenorio40 (talk) 13:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Armbrust has approved the article. As to the rating: WikiProject Articles for creation/Grading scheme gives an overview of the scale used. Congratulations! Jarkeld (talk) 14:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

In what way am i vandalising Wikipedia?
I have every right to file a complaint against a fellow user if he swore at me, and then provoked me...just because you are friends with him, doesn't meant that you have to take sides....Swe41 (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This moving around of comments by other users in a discussion is considered vandalism, as is this bogus edit to Dr.K's talk page. De728631 (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Jarkeld (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Fest Elevation
Hello, Jarkeld

Can you tell me that what is unsourced in the sources i have mentioned in the Article i am creating. As the festival is going to be take place in the last week of April. Please reply as soon as possible...

Nishantkango (talk) 12:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Nishant KangoNishantkango (talk) 12:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The main references are not independent of the subject (per this guideline), the third ref is passable, but not enough. The article has another major problem: there is no mention of why the event it is notable (see Event for the guidelines). Jarkeld (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Squeezers
Hi Jarkeld, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Squeezers

I am just wondering why this was moved, this is a band that has airplays in fm stations in philippines and has an album under Universal Records called "Squeezers: AutoReverse 3 Motor 4 Head" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.107.149.80 (talk) 11:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It was moved as it is a very short, poorly sourced article that had an AFC tag on it, so I moved it to project space. I reviewed it and found that it lacked any real indication of notability (per WP:MUSIC) so I declined the article. Jarkeld (talk) 11:19, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

But if i put in more info, will it be accepted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperdollhair (talk • contribs) 11:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If you can produce reliable sources that confirm the band meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC, yes. Jarkeld (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thank you Jarkeld. I just need to put in more links and reliable sources. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperdollhair (talk • contribs) 11:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC) Last question, how will i know if it has been accepted, when i can already access this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeezers ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperdollhair (talk • contribs) 11:32, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Controversy
It's best to remove the section on the Channel Awesome page called "Controversy" as the section has little to nothing to do with the company itself and more to do with inside drama within the company. The section also clearly lies about Rizzo's involvement with Transmission Awesome. He did not create the podcast. The company article isn't the place for Internet drama and does not need to be on the page. Furthermore, stating that he was "blanket banned" and is an "unperson" is slander. The article should stick to the facts and not hearsay. No drama related things should be on the page. 24.218.95.146 (talk) 01:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for removing vandalism from my talk page. Fleet Command (talk) 05:27, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

AfD: Cort Webber and Bobby "Fatboy" Roberts
This is a courtesy notice given your prior involvement with Articles for deletion/Cort and Fatboy or its deletion review (Deletion review/Log/2011 April 10) that these related articles are currently listed at AfD at Articles for deletion/Cort Webber. As attribution issues are involved, closure of this current AfD may result in the restoration of the earlier article, as a list of contributors would be necessary if the articles are retained. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles for Creation barnstar
Thanks! Jarkeld (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you and please support my cause. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiman1717 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Avraham Tal


The article Avraham Tal has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 14:19, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Katarrama
Just wanted to let you know (since you held the article at WP:AFC) that I have placed a PROD tag on it because I can find no reliable sources to establish the notability of this group. Your input on the talk page is appreciated.  ArcAngel    (talk) ) 19:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

JacQues Olet Article
I have made the changes you requested. Added incline and wikified. Thank You 24.187.106.148 (talk) 16:26, 8 July 2011 (UTC)