User talk:JarrickLow

September 2019
Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kelsey Chow without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Why are you blanking the Asian names on large numbers of biographies? Please respond promptly or, as you're using no edit summaries, I'm going to have to mass-revert you, because it's unclear why you're doing this. If the names or other data are wrong, please explain why. Sourcing that would explain how to correct any problems would also be helpful. Thanks. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Userify
Hi there. I moved the content at Singaporean_name to User:JarrickLow/Singaporean_name as this does not appear to be an article meant for Wikipedia's article space. Perhaps you meant it for the Wikipedia: space, but it needs significantly more polishing before being moved there. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) (click me!)    19:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Jarrick, since you're writing guidelines for Wikipedia editors (similar to Naming conventions (Chinese)), I've moved your essay to Naming conventions (Singapore). While you are still free to create a mainspace article about Singaporean name, it would need to be an encyclopedic article like the article Chinese name is. Notice how Chinese name includes encyclopedic information while Naming conventions (Chinese) includes guidelines for Wikipedia editors. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

 * Question: I'd like to know why you say the IP is "shared by many residents", and why you think one of these "residents" would be mistaken for you in a checkuser and behavioral investigation? - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 00:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

IP Address
Because it is the IP address of the entire building? JarrickLow (talk) 01:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Blocking
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.