User talk:JarrodSwens

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, JarrodSwens, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 01:04, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Clive Peeters
Hello JarrodSwens. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Clive Peeters, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Additionally:
 * Please do not remove reliably sourced sections of text with giving a reason as you did in . The fraud is relevant to the company history and subsequent fall into administration. If a new business entity by the same name now exists then that should be pointed out (with sources), not historical information arbitrarily deleted.
 * Do not add un-sourced and 'PR' type text as you did  in.

--220  of  Borg 19:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)