User talk:Jarrowood

Speedy deletion of ConXPoint
A tag has been placed on ConXPoint, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please do not recreate deleted pages. Doing so is disruptive, and can eventually lead to blocks. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

ConXPoint
A tag has been placed on ConXPoint, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If you re-create ConXPoint in substantively the same form one more time, you will be blocked. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If you believe that your article meets the guideline at WP:CORP, please list it at WP:DRV for an undeletion discussion.  Corvus cornix  talk  22:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Thirty-one hours. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * As I've indicated via e-mail, I'll unblock you if you agree to change tactics - either by taking this to WP:DRV or by recreating the article in such a way that it clearly claims to comply with WP:CORP. Is it a deal? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 23:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm taking off. I'm fine with any admin granting the unblock if Jarrowood has agreed the terms I set out above. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 23:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back
Hi Jarrowood - I'm the admin who blocked you all those months ago (back when I went by Sarcasticidealist), but I'm pleased to see you back now planning to contribute within Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I've taken a quick look at User:Jarrowood/mvsw, and it looks like you're off to a good start. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. Best, Steve Smith (talk) 20:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I decided to just stop trying to write an article about ConXPoint after you let me back in. It was a learning experience for me. Even before that happened, I've had arguments debates with people about the integrity of Wikipedia and the content. I've always been somewhat of a social constructionist whether it be related to language or knowledge. After that experience, I have no doubt of the integrity of information disseminated by Wikipedia.

I'm glad you checked in. I planned on revising the Mountain Valley article a bit more, then send it to someone for feedback before I tried posting. I'm an editor for DMOZ and I'd like to contribute more to Wikipedia, but I have a lot to learn about the Wiki interface. Jarrowood (talk) 03:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Feedback Request
How do I go about requesting feedback on an article from an editor? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarrowood (talk • contribs)
 * If you have a specific editor in mind, you can leave a note on their talk page (which will be located at "User talk:NAME OF EDITOR" - so mine is at User talk:Steve Smith). You can also list it for peer review, though if you list it there it could take a couple of weeks before somebody gets around to it. Steve Smith (talk) 00:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Mv-spring-water.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mv-spring-water.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:59, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mv-spring-water.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mv-spring-water.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)