User talk:Jasca Ducato

Please follow this link.

Re: 194.80.20.10
User:Wiki alf originally blocked this IP due to vandalism. I presume you may have been editing from Maidstone Grammar School? Due to the large number of vandal editors from this IP, it is usually blocked. I had to edit from school, so I temporarily unblocked the IP whilst I edited. I reblocked the IP after and that is why my name showed up on the block log. Thanks, — FireFox • T • 17:19, 23 January 2006 
 * Ah, same difference or there abouts. Your IP block at Aylesford Sports College is mainly due to the spamheads at Maidstone Grammar School. I apologise on behalf of them all. The IP won't be blocked permanantly, so it's pot luck whether it's blocked or not when you try to edit from Aylesford Sports College. Thanks, — FireFox • T • 20:11, 23 January 2006 

Image Tagging Image:PRO-09 IMG.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PRO-09 IMG.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 23:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Dr Jim Mui m1112353.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dr Jim Mui m1112353.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 01:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Darkslide.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Darkslide.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.96.252 10:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Darkslide.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Darkslide.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.96.252 10:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: 194.80.20.10
I have changed some settings of the block, you should be able to edit now. --WinHunter (talk) 12:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Lithium
Please do not move pages without discussion, as you did to Lithium (song). The proposal was just discussed last week and did not succeed; the Nirvana song is by far the most famous one and the Evanescence song is not yet even notable enough for its own article; it is currently just a redirect to the album, as it should be. Kafziel Talk 12:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, when you move a page, the system will automatically make the old location into a redirect to the new location. You shouldn't change that to a redirect to a disambiguation page. When you did that, hundreds of articles that linked to Lithium (song) were suddenly linking to Lithium (disambiguation), and linking to disambiguation pages is rarely a good thing. I'm going to leave the article at Lithium (Nirvana song) but I have changed the redirect back so that "Lithium (song)" redirects to "Lithium (Nirvana song)". If the Evanescence song is ever notable enough to sustain an article of its own, "Lithium (song)" can be turned into a disambiguation page (after discussion!) but then all of the Nirvana articles will need to be edited to avoid the disambiguation page.

I know it's kind of a complicated process, but it's the best way to ensure that readers find what they are looking for. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Kafziel Talk 13:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Star Wars Fanon
I've nominated the article Star Wars Fanon for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Star Wars Fanon satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Star Wars Fanon. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Star Wars Fanon during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. Kafziel Talk 14:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Face of Boe
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please always observe our core policies. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 14:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Sith edits
We do not allow unreferenced material to be added to Wikipedia. The entire article was almost completely unsourced, and the previous fact tag had been there for over a year. No references, not allusions, no nothing. I had warned folk it was coming via the Discussion page, and waited over a week before executing the edit. I even moved the excised material to an archive, located here, allowing for folk to refer to the material needing to be cited, so that whatever effort was expended in writing it wouldn't simply be lost (and believe you me, I caught a bit of hell for even doing that). The point of this is, the material is uncited. You must see that. It cannot remain in a Wikipedia article as is, and cannot return until substantial citations are added. If you want to discuss this, you can on the Discussion page. If you feel that my interpretation of Wikipedia's policy on citation is being incorrectly interpreted, please feel free to consult an admin on the matter. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  15:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Slipknot's fourth studio album
Please do not remove the AfD template until the discussion is not over. It is inactive, yes, but it is not over. This is clearly stated on the template itself.  Zouavman   Le   Zouave   06:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Slipknot's fourth studio album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  tomasz.  09:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Slipknot (band)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

 Zouavman   Le   Zouave   22:05, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

 Zouavman   Le   Zouave   22:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Slipknot (band)
I have responded to your comments made on the article's talk page. I would appreciate your input. I would also recommend that you put Slipknot (band) in your Watchlist, if you haven't done so already. Thanks in advance,  Zouavman   Le   Zouave   10:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. PabloMartinez 21:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Sith edits
Your comment here wasn't very helpful, and onlyse serves either to start an edit war, chase away a fellow editor or to get yourself blocked. I've removed it, and would suggest that if you are interested in commenting on the post, that you resubmit a response that is more in keeping with how you would prefer your post's responses to be. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  05:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You might want to bone up on Wiki-policy, JD. If your could be so kind as to point out where in wiki policy it is okay to make the sort of comment you did. I removed your comment as per the civility policy. You might want to consult an admin regarding this topic before re-adding it again. Of course, if you do, you will get to know an admin really well. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  14:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.  nancy   (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Swjvs3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Swjvs3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Evanescence edit
Greetings Jasca, in a recent edit you made to the article Evanescence (diff), you uncensored a word, saying that Wikipedia does not censor content. While this is normally correct, direct citations are never changed from the format that is presented in the source. Here, the source used 'f--k', therefore, we also must use that or else it stops being a direct citation. Just keep this in mind in the future. If there are any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 19:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Slipknot AoF Voting
Following the great success of the Slipknot (album) article after receiving the attention of the Slipknot WikiProject's collaborative effort, the "Article of Focus" (read more) voting on the second article to recieve it's attention is now open. The articles nominated to choose from are Voliminal: Inside the Nine and Slipknot discography, please head over to AoF talk page to vote for which you think should recieve the AoF attention next. Voting ends on 06.02.08 at 8pm GMT.  Rezter  TALK  18:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Slipknot AoF #2
The second AoF has been decided, Slipknot discography is the article chosen by vote. You can see what this task is for and its aims here. As you are a member of the project, your participation in this task is greatly welcomed and the quicker and better that we improve the article the more efficient the project will become. Please head over the the talk page and identify areas for improvement on the to-do list and begin to achieve these goals. Collaboration is the key word for the AoF and collaborating with 1 or more users on certain tasks is recommended, communications should be made on users talk pages.  Rezter  TALK  09:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

AoF Reminder
I would just like to remind you as a member of the Slipknot Wikiproject that Nominations are open for the third AoF candidate so please, nominate the article which you think deserves the AoF attention over at the talk page. Thanks very much and I would also like to say that work on the discography page is coming along good but all members are recommended to collaborate in helping develop the article.  Rezter  TALK  11:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Sith Edits
Regarding this edit, might I trouble you to note where that citation exists, and how it isn't all that crufty? Plus, you need to cite that Palpatine is in fact a Sith (we know he is, but its about what we can prove). - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  21:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Why does this guy think Palpatine's not a Sith? He is Darth Sidious. Paddy Simcox (talk) 09:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sith emblem.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sith emblem.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Slipknot AoF #3
The third AoF has been decided, Iowa (album) is the article chosen by default due to single nomination. You can see what this task is for and its aims here. As you are a member of the Slipknot WikiProject, your participation in this task is greatly welcomed and the quicker and better that we improve the article, the more efficient the project will become. Please head over the the talk page and identify areas for improvement on the to-do list and begin to achieve these goals. Collaboration is the key word for the AoF and collaborating with 1 or more users on certain tasks is recommended, communications can be made on the articles talk page or on user's talk pages. Nominations are now open for the fourth AoF so head over to the AoF talk page and nominate which article you think should recieve the attention next.  REZTER  TALK   &oslash;  22:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Anakin Skywalker
The text reads that night (meaning the same night) it is never said that it is the SAME night that Padme tells him she is pregnant. Also, in EP. II Anakin himself tells Padme when he is outside Meditating that "jedi don't have nightmare's". --Vertigo315 (talk) 19:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Also hes a Dark Jedi not a Sith Lord. Dakr Jedi are stronger than sith lords. Look HERE.(76.211.140.155 (talk) 20:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC))

AfD nomination of Psychosocial (song)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Psychosocial (song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Psychosocial (song). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, you noted "Revert. Every other single soon to be released has ana rticle, so why should Slipknot's be any different" Slipknot is not any different. With your revert of my redirect, Category:Upcoming_singles has five songs in it. Three of them are at AfD for redirects, Moving Mountains (song) has charted and High Price has significant press coverage in reliable, third-party sources. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Request to move article Skate (video game) incomplete
You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Skate (video game) to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:


 * 1) Added    at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article.  This creates the required template for you there.
 * 2) Added  NewName  to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
 * 3) Added  PageName  to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 23:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Fable II
How is the current version better and more neccessary than the version you reverted by the anon ip? ~ QuasiAbstract {talk/contrib} 19:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Rodney Mullen
Hi - You recently edited Rodney Mullen and placed a "citation needed" link on the section "Mullen's invented tricks". This section is cited (see reference #6). Did you miss this or are you suggesting the page needs additional citations? Thanks! Steve-g (talk) 20:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Personnel
Next time discuss things before you change them and you may get an answer. They were put in that order for a reason.  REZTER  TALK   &oslash;  17:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

It's listed as:
 * vocalist (frontman)
 * guitars
 * bass
 * drums
 * additional precussion
 * electronics

When we were doing List of Slipknot band members it was the order that we mutually agreed on.  REZTER  TALK   &oslash;  17:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Wales
Aside from being factually wrong (England does not have Principalities) you should pay attention to the agreed consensus on Wales (as well as Scotland) as to their status. This is dcoumented on the talk page and the evidence is summarised [| here] -- Snowded  TALK  14:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello JD. England has principalities?? GoodDay (talk) 22:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I always thought England was a Kingdom, until 1707. GoodDay (talk) 22:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Wait a sec. When you said England has principalities, did you mean the United Kingdom has principalites? GoodDay (talk) 22:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Even if he did, it would still not be the case -- Snowded  TALK  07:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * (Res to both of you) Okie Dokie. GoodDay (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Wales (more correctly, a part of it) was a principality before the conquest and during the periods it was administered by the heir-apparent (as Prince of Wales). It was fully integrated by statute and has not been a principality since then. Wales is a country. A country does not have to be sovereign to be a country. To some extent it has to do with popular feeling. It would be weird to call U.S. states "countries", but it used to be normal. In fact, for a significant period, one's state was one's country more so than the United States. If the Welsh think they're a country, they're a country. -Rrius (talk) 23:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It is also defined as a country by the UK Government by the way. Just for historical accuracy, the hier-apparent did have estates in Wales, but so did many others so its inaccurate to say that the Prince of Wales was ever prince in any conventional sense of the word.  -- Snowded   TALK  09:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Halo 3: Recon
Hello. I noticed you recently split this article off from the Halo (series) article. Are you aware that the article (with a different name) was around before and there was an AfD for the article that closed with a consensus to merge with Halo (series)? The decision to merge took place just 4 days ago... was it overturned somewhere or were you just being extra bold? Themfromspace (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Slipknot
Most biographies for rock bands have rock music rather than specific genres, especially in cases where it is not widely agreed that a listed genre defines the band. Heavy metal is a form of rock music, thus the labeling is entirely appropriate. Take a look at the article Black Sabbath and its corresponding talk page for related discussion, and please discuss any changes you wish to make before reverting another edit. The use of the "undo" function without additional explanation should only be applied to vandalism. (Sugar Bear (talk) 18:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC))

Orphaned non-free media (File:ScuzzNew2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:ScuzzNew2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

edit
This isn't really fair, I've seen a video which confirms those statements. Some rewording might have done the trick instead of major reverting. Mallerd (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * source video. There you go. It is a rather long video, 17 or 18 minutes, but I assure you it's in there (economic system and Leonardo's inventions). Mallerd (talk) 17:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Can't help to giggle a bit. This video is an interview with the people from Ubisoft. Since it's an interview, the information is throughout the video. Too bad if you won't watch it, because it's going in the article. Mallerd (talk) 16:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Period of Assassin's Creed II
Talk:Assassin's Creed II --PhantomT1412 (talk) 20:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Win8 & gaming
Hi. I have removed your additions again since I still believe it to be nothing more than rumour at this point. I have started a discussion on the talkpage Talk:History of Microsoft Windows which further explains my reasoning. As a small aside, Rahul Sood has a vague job title (GM for System Experience in the Interactive Entertainment Business) and it is synthesis to assume he is even working on Windows 8, let alone call him the Windows 8 Project General Manager. Regards, wjemather bigissue 10:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mortal and Immortal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Interwiki inks in your userspace
Hello.

I have changed the formatting (but did not alter the targets – links still resolve to the same locations) for improvement purposes. You can see my edits here and here. Thanks. 69.155.132.121 (talk) 23:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC), last modified 23:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Assassin's Creed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mohawk


 * List of Assassin's Creed characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mohawk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Dorn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heroes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Re your edit summary
In response to your edit summary that read "What on earth are you doing?", The article didn't exist at the time and thus the wasn't needed. I'm sure I don't need to remind you to assume good faith since you've been here since 2006, but I'm going to anyway because you did not seem like you did in your edit summary. Have a great day.  CRRays Head90  | Get Some! 17:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * With respect, the article did exist at the time; albeit it was named incorrectly. --Jasca Ducato (talk) 23:21, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of Assassin's Creed characters shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Niemti (talk) 14:53, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Your recent editing history at BioShock Infinite shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''Please review WP:BRD. You were reverted by two different editors (including myself), and technically have passed 3RR already. Use the talk page if you feel there is a problem.'' M ASEM (t) 15:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Xbox One, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 18:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * May I ask that next you place an automated message on my page, you take the time to actually explain what it was about my edit that you found to break the MoS? I also find it hard to fathom how you seem to think adding wording at the start of sentence, breaks the flow of said sentence. (If it had been dumped in the middle, I would have agreed with your reasoning, as it is, I've reverted your edit due tot he fact that it, once again, reads in a way that states the following text as fact, rather than opinion). --Jasca Ducato (talk) 08:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558097350 your edit] to Horse Guards Parade may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Assassin's Creed Genres
I have made a discussion topic on the talk page for Assassin's Creed so we can discuss whether or not we want "historical" to be a genre as opposed to the year. I agree with you and several other users on this that it should be, but User: Darkwarriorblake does not see eye to eye with us. I'm typing this to let you know we are discussing it there. Midnightstrike3625 (talk) 23:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Slipknot (band)
Please give a valid reason before senselessly reverting stuff. Thanks. I call the big one bitey (talk) 11:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * My valid reason, as given on your original edit, is that this has been discussed to death multiple times, and that the consensus is that it remains as "heavy metal". --Jasca Ducato (talk) 12:22, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Can you show me a link to this so called consensus for "heavy metal" to be used in the lead. Not trying to be rude or anything, it's just i think my "plan" (calling them metal instead of heavy metal in the lead) works a lot better. Regards. I call the big one bitey (talk) 15:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't have the time to list each and every single mention of the genre being discussed. Since the onus is on you, as the editor, to back up your change, I kindly suggest you check the archived discussion pages (specifically Archives 9 backward). --Jasca Ducato (talk) 09:30, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Brian Tyler for AC IV
Hello Jasca. I'd was wondering if you could take a look over at Brian Tyler and just keep an eye on it for a bit. There is an IP that is insisting that the AC IV credit be kept on the page, even though it has never been officially announced through a reliable source. They are claiming that a YouTube interview with the game director counts, but upon further review, it is not any interview from a reputable source's channel (Ubisoft, Assassin's Creed, IGN, GameSpot, etc). I have tried explaining to them, but don't know where I stand now with my reverts, so just asking to you see, since you make many great contributions to the AC pages. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure thing, I'll keep an eye. I just had a quick look at his article on the AC Wiki (the fact that he has an article seems to suggest he has some involvement) but it's not sourced. --Jasca Ducato (talk) 16:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Same. I looked there to see if they had a source, and they didn't. All I've been able to find from a quick google search, is forum posts. Thanks again. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

A screen grab of a Facebook post is not reliable.. if the Facebook profile is verified and reliable then post directly to it, using an image of a Facebook post isn't acceptable, it's unverifiable.  Я ehevkor ✉  11:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Rehevkor on this one. That screen grab can't be used, as UbiGabe did not post this info, so even if we got to his page, we can't link to the comment. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

EIC
Hi there. Thanks for catching the British British! It turns out it was my handiwork! Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  16:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

I think you need to read the article protagonist
The more you know. --Niemti (talk) 10:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

You might also red the articles such as http://www.polygon.com/2013/3/20/4126766/bioshock-infinite-initial-elizabeth-character-design-wasnt-attractive ("co-protagonist) or http://www.business-standard.com/article/technology/bioshock-infinite-magic-in-the-game-113040700296_1.html ("In fact, she is the protagonist, while DeWitt is the playable character."). --Niemti (talk) 10:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I did read the article. Booker DeWitt is the playable character, the main character, which by our on article's definition is 'the protagonist'. The Business Standard link you have provided means nothing; the author was in no way involved in the development of the game. --Jasca Ducato (talk) 10:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * "Our on article's definition" is wrong, Shawn Robertson was "in way involved in the development of the game", citation needed for your claim she's not a protagonist ("When we asked Jeffrey about Elizabeth taking the spotlight, she insisted that Liz has been the protagonist of Infinite all along"). "Booker and Elizabeth, the two main protagonists", "protagonists Booker and Elizabeth", etc etc. Whole article: He Doesn’t Row’: How BioShock Infinite Isn’t Booker’s Story. --Niemti (talk) 10:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=577251321 your edit] to Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Assassin's Creed and parkour?
Hi Jasca,

I'm not really sure why you are convinced why we should include the template on the article on Assassin's Creed. Parkour might've influenced one particular element of gameplay (which would be running and jumping over obstacles and buildings) and that is the reason why someone put into the parkour template. But does that necessarily mean it should be put on the respective article also? --Soetermans. T / C 09:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm of the opinion that if an article is included on a template, said template should, in turn, be included on the article. That is, after all, the whole point of a navbox... That said, if the link was removed from the template, there would be no reason to have it in the article. However, if somebody were to remove the link from the template, they would also have to remove all the other links in the 'games' section of the template, by the same justification. --Jasca Ducato (talk) 10:55, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If I understand you correctly, because it is linked on the template, the template should be on the article? I guess that makes sense... But to me, parkour and Assassin's Creed (or those other games linked) aren't that connected. Assassin's Creed is about the struggle between Assassins and Templars, not about parkour. Shall we take this to WT:VG? Maybe with some input we can come to a general consensus. --Soetermans. T / C 11:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC) P.S. I really have to get to my study books, I'll check again later this day (it's half past one where I am).
 * Respectfully, I must disagree; Parkour and freeruning is a fundamental part of the Assassin's Creed IP, and has been since the start. (Indeed, the original idea for the series stemmed from creating a parkour-based game, not an historical one.) That said, you are correct that the story is centered on the Assassin/Templar war, but the template is not disputing that. --Jasca Ducato (talk) 13:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Assassin's Creed (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levantine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL project.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

AC4 ending
I'm sorry, but I dispute your notion that the final details of the plot write-up are superfluous and unnecessary. The presence of the Sage is extremely important. The game establishes that he was born with memories of the Observatory, even though it is eighty million years old. He is shown to have the ability to reincarnate, and the Assassins make it clear that this does not happen regularly, but rather as necessary, implying there is a precedent. Neither the Assassins nor the Templars can explain his presence at Abstergo or how he managed to get by them. Juno says she has more than one follower, and the Sage is clearly responsible for the attempt to free her. The Sage clearly describes himself as being something other than human, and his final words make no sense as they do not refer to any events or people in the game. Although there is no further explanation within the story, there is clearly some Precursor presence on earth, and the Sage is their agent. It's anything but superfluous. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 09:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fableiii.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fableiii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

List of Star Wars air, aquatic, and ground vehicles Sand Crawler
It says that a Sandcrawler appeaered in Attack of the Clones, in actuality 2 of them appeared.
 * Erm, OK? --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 07:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Can you fix it? My wiki account has been banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.60.230 (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely sure that's necessary, Anon. The current wording is technically correct, and editing the article simply to emphasize the fact that more than one of this particular vehicle appeared in-move feels somewhat redundant to me. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 07:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Darth Vader
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Darth Vader. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 09:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

The Doctor (Doctor Who)
Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. -- / Alex /21  11:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Your recent editing history at Morbius (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''It is not standard to use “is directed”, nor is it grammatically correct. Please stop reverting.'' Toa Nidhiki05 14:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I have asked you to leave a note on this issue on the article's talk page, not here. --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 16:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 14:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * My apologies for the above, that was very much an overreaction. I don't have too many despite a decade here, but this was one. My apologies again. Jeppiz (talk) 20:43, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Soma
Please read this: https://kotaku.com/weeks-later-somas-haunting-ending-still-has-players-de-1741773285 —   (talk) 17:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * What about it? --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 22:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * As the facility goes dark, Simon 3.0 begins to realize his horrible predicament. Stuck at the bottom of the ocean, a copy of a copy of a copy, there’s no hope. Yes, Simon 4.0 is out there in the stars, but Simon 3.0 will never leave Earth. “Please don’t leave me alone,” he screams. “Catherine? Catherine?” The coin toss shows no mercy. There’s a brief epilogue for Simon 4.0, however, in which he wakes up on the ARK with Catherine. Neither is aware of what happened to their previous selves. —   (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Besides the fact that this sentence runs contrary to the rest of the author's analysis of the game, specifically: "When the transfer occurs, as Simon 2.0 is copied and births Simon 3.0, Simon 3.0 awakens and hears someone familiar talking around the corner: Simon 2.0. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this causes Simon 2.0 to freak out." which makes quite clear that the newest version of Simon is fully aware of what happens during the "transfer" (read: duplication), it is also noteworthy that this is an opinion piece, not an official review or analysis. As such, it holds no water. Further still, not being "aware of what happened to their previous selves" does not equal "completely unaware of the other Simon left behind on PATHOS-II," which reads like Simon 4.0 has no knowledge of 3.0 whatsoever.


 * Still, even if one could succsssfully argue that the game is ambiguous enough to suggest 4.0 is not aware of 3.0's predicament, that specific clause's inclusion is not necessary as the point of the sentence is that 4.0 and Catherine are now on the ARK, not that 3.0 is still on PATHOS-II (which was already addressed in the previous sentence). --Jasca Ducato (talk | contributions) 09:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cognissonance (talk) 10:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm WikiHannibal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cyberpunk 2077, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - This of course is only a pro-forma template (placed only after you added unsourced info into the article twice in a row) to make sure you do not continue in this manner indefinitely. WikiHannibal (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Merry Merry!


★Trekker (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Template on Zack Snyder’s Justice League
Hey, so Warner Bros. confirmed that Zack Snyder’s Justice League is going to be released as a movie. So, can we change the template box to film instead of television? FilmLover72 (talk) 16:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Your edit
Hey, hope you are going well. Thanks for letting me know (in the edit summary) about the excessive images on skateboarding article. However, just a kind note, that if an image snugs in the article, then it is ok for it to be used. I did realise somewhat I added too much, but many thanks for informing me, I will take immediate action to remove images. Also, I noted you removed the pic about the skater girl. I've added this image because we need to showcase that the skater girls have revolutionised skateboarding and its practices, its very common to see girls skateboarding, and I will remove the necessary images, as I thought I was illustrating the article. Sorry about that :) -- Eurovision Nim (talk to me)(see my edits) 12:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

ScarJo works
I totally agree, but one editor has added the cat to 50+ articles, so I just decided to reinstate it as it would be very tedious to remove them all. I would appreciate any help with that. IronManCap (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I see you already did the necessary. Thanks a lot. IronManCap (talk) 15:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem. -- JascaDucato (talk &#124; contributions) 15:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Screenshot for Assassin's Creed Syndicate: Jack the Ripper
Hi Jasca Ducato, hope you are well. I recently created a standalone page about Assassin's Creed Syndicate: Jack the Ripper. Not long afterwards, an editor put in a request for an in-game screenshot to help better illustrate the article on the talk page. As you seem to be the most active Wikipedian who is interested in Assassin's Creed-related articles that I am aware of, I thought I'd ask for your input or opinion on what aspect of the DLC would be the best choice as the subject of the proposed screenshot. Haleth (talk) 03:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Haleth, I appreciate you reaching out. I think your best bet would be to get a gameplay screenshot with the player in control of Jack; even better if you can get one with the scrawled messages (representing Jack's supposed insanity) appearing on screen as well. If memory serves, these appear most if not every time you play as Jack in the DLC, so it shouldn't be too hard to get a screenshot. -- JascaDucato (talk &#124; contributions) 08:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your response, and I will take your suggestion into consideration. Haleth (talk) 05:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

This change was made by whom?
By the looks of it there was never a discussion to change to BCE beside you just randomly changing it to BCE this is a clear violation of MOS:ERA Wildestc (talk) 11:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * To the best of my knowledge, MOS:ERA does not require a discussion, only recommends. All other Assassin's Creed video game articles use the BCE/CE date format, so these changes were made to bring the three most recent articles in-line with that convention. -- JascaDucato (talk &#124; contributions) 13:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * "An article's established era style should NOT be changed without reasons specific to its content; seek CONSENSUS on the talk page first" doesn't seem hard to understand imo Wildestc (talk) 13:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * So FOR NOW i'm reverting the era style back to BC/AD until you get consensus on the talk page (as stated in MOS:ERA) Wildestc (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Dune 2 BRD started
You appear to be edit warring on Dune 2. Your bold edit was already reverted under BRD. Make consensus on Talk prior to further edits. HenryRoan (talk) 01:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * BRD is optional, and even less relevant when your edits are introducing inaccurate information into an article. If you wish to discuss these edits, we can do so, but we'll be doing so with the correct plot points in the article as standard. -- JascaDucato (talk &#124; contributions) 12:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

You appear to be edit warring to force your edits into the article. Establish consensus on the Talk page prior to further edits. HenryRoan (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * No. -- JascaDucato (talk &#124; contributions) 13:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello. Can you please tell me which guideline states that the 165 minutes and 37 seconds should be 166 minutes? The source explicitly says that the runtime is 2 hours and 45 minutes, not 2 hours and 46 minutes. Medxvo (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi. The guidance for the runtime field on Template:Infobox film advises: "If the running time is given to the second, round it to the minute." (At 30s+, one should round up.) As for the source, the exact words are: "Dune 2 runs for a confirmed 165 minutes and 37 seconds, or 2 hours and 45 minutes." So, the source is rounding down for some reason. -- JascaDucato (talk &#124; contributions) 19:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I see. I think it's best to keep it at 166 minutes then. Thank you for replying! Medxvo (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)