User talk:Jascar19

Welcome...

Hello, Jascar19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there.

Removal of content
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Boghog2 (talk) 19:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Tamoxifen
Hi. In the tamoxifen article, I have reinserted the following text that you have deleted in this edit without explanation:

The above sentence is based on the following statement on page 666 in the Hurtado 2008 Nature paper:
 * More specifically, the ratio of PAX2 and AIB-1 predicts the efficacy of tamoxifen therapy.


 * Alterations in the AIB-1/PAX2 stoichiometry dictate the efficacy of tamoxifen in breast cancers.

I believe the above is relevant to the tamoxifen article and is backed up with reliable sources and therefore should be included in the article. I therefore have difficulty in understanding why you have deleted this statement. Do you disagree with my interpretation of the authors conclusions, or the conclusions made in the paper, or the relevance of the statement to the tamoxifen article?

Please note that if you delete something from a Wikipedia article, you should at least provide a brief justification in the edit summary. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 07:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Tamoxifen article edits
I am having great difficulty understanding why you have repeatedly deleted the following content from the tamoxifen article:


 * More specifically, the ratio of PAX2 and AIB-1 predicts the efficacy of tamoxifen therapy.
 * About 35% of UK breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen become resistant to the drug and insufficient expression or functioning of PAX2 is thought to be behind a large number of these tamoxifen resistant cases.

The only explanation that you have provided to date is the following cryptic edit:
 * (INCORRECT. Check facts)

To the best of my knowledge, the above two statements which you have deleted are accurate and consistent with the following sources:

Are you disputing my interpretation of these sources or the sources themselves? I would appreciate if you would respond to my questions so that we could resolve this dispute in a amicable manner. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for the explanation which I accept. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 14:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

NCOA3
I really don't see what the problem is with the following statement:

Agreed that it is not validated yet. That is why the word may was used. So why do you keep deleting the above statement?

Also, in your comment:

Then by all means, please add it. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)