User talk:Jashleybarber/sandbox

Jordyn, you did a wonderful job summarizing your topic in the introductory section, just giving us a general idea of what we will see in the article. Your subsections are very well organized and easy to follow and as for the amount of content, I think it is sufficient. You do a nice job at remaining neutral, but at the end when you are discussing social justice today make sure to seem unbiased here. You can site sources or say groups of people feel a certain way so you don’t seem to have an opinion. Your citations are beautifully done, I need to definitely take notes from how you cited. Your templets seem to be complete and I clicked on your sources and they are reliable.

Sean McDonough Peer Evaluation: Introductory Sentence: Great introductory sentence Summary: Your entire introductory paragraph with the summary of the topic is well written. Context: Even though I didn't see you cover intersectionality in your introductory paragraph you do seem to cover just about everything else. Organization Pt. 1: Topics are all put in their respective sections with good headers. Organization Pt. 2: Great organization. Content Pt. 1: It looks like you've created a whole new wikipedia article with the amount of information you've added. There are now sections about the creator, the history, intersectionality, and where social justice feminism is today. Content Pt. 2: I saw you also edited the introductory paragraph and I like how it reads now. Content Pt. 3: Very well balanced. Content Pt. 4: Good tone throughout. Content Pt. 5: I could not guess a perspective. Content Pt. 6: Nope. Citations: Great amount of citations throughout the article. Sources Pt. 1: Good sources and credible. Sources Pt. 2: Very good sources for the topic. Sources Pt. 3: Sources are well distributed throughout all information. Completeness: Citations completed well.Smcdonough827 (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Hao Duong Peer Review
-	Lead Sentence: I think you have a great lead sentence for your article! -	Summary: You have summarized the novel and it’s context, you have also included the it’s impact on its audiences -	Context: I think you have done a great job in explaining the term “Third World” and “ Feminism”, which would help the audiences to understand more about the context of the novel. I think if you could include a little bit more the audiences's reaction over the novel or the critics, I think it will be beneficial for your article. -	Organization: The bold header surely have helped me to follow and to understand the article more easily -	Content: Your article surely have a rich content which provide me, as a leader, to understand more about the novel and the context about it. Moreover, I glad that you have chosen the topic of Feminism outside of the US, as a non- American. -	Citations: You have the sources to support your article!-	The sources are well included in the article. -	I think you have done a good job with your article and I can already see that you will have a amazing final articles with just a little bit more works — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.237.14.21 (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)