User talk:Jasmen

Hi Jasmen. You have posted a number of articles which I have tagged with db-empty. The problem is not with the article subjects, which I have not examined, but rather the lack of of almost any information. Please see Stub for threshold information. Please take particular note of the following:"A stub is an article that is too short to be genuinely useful, but not so short as to be useless. In general, it must be long enough to at least define the article's title, which generally means 3 to 10 short sentences."The articles, as posted, contain barely one sentence. It would be great of you took just a little more time on each one to provide basic information so they reach stub status. Thanks and happy editing!--Fuhghettaboutit 21:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello. I don't know what your position is at USAK. However, even though you dont like its criticisms to be included in the article, we have to adhere to NPOV - which also means that criticism should be presented to any subject. I am sorry if you feel offended, but please dont labet it as attacks when criticism is added to an article. Bertilvidet 07:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Ha ha. Even though you are very cautious about keeping a high profile (i.e. "non-nationalistic") among users who do not understand Turkish or aware of your split with ASAM (for reasons I don't know why, well that's market economy anyway) you will not be able to conceal that you are a primarily Turkish nationalist and particularly anti-Armenian institution. No matter how hard you try you won't keep Wikipedia as the space you have the ultimate reputation. Keep it better next time. ¡Hasta la vista! Behemoth 23:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.  Bertilvidet 08:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Biga Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences
A template has been added to the article Biga Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ali Akdemir


The article Ali Akdemir has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 03:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Samsun–Ceyhan pipeline for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsun–Ceyhan pipeline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Samsun–Ceyhan pipeline until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chidgk1 (talk) 08:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)