User talk:JasmineO0o

Welcome!
Hello, JasmineO0o, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Nina Burleigh does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  07:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Nina Burleigh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. "See discussion of your content at Talk:Nina Burleigh. Once material has been challenged, you may not re-add it or revert the reversion. That constitutes edit warring. Persistent edit warring may result in your loss of editing privileges."  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  08:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Nina Burleigh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  11:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  11:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

JasmineO0o, you are invited to the Teahouse!
== Notice relating to (i) all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people	and (ii) living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to living or recently deceased people ==


 * Please carefully read the above information. Neutralitytalk 00:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Tim Kaine page
You're welcome to join the discussion at Talk:Tim Kaine about his son, where there's a consensus not to add the material you added there and elsewhere. But you are likely to be banned from biographical articles if your conduct continues. Possibly by me. Doug Weller talk 07:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bakilas (talk) 08:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)