User talk:Jason592

Nomination of Nato Feelz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nato Feelz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nato Feelz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS 4444 Talk  04:39, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Intro to Wikipedia
Jason, sorry for the rather rude introduction to Wikipedia editing. I see you are a new editor, and it can be very disheartening for a new editor to have his first act as a Wikipedian— in your case, the creation of an article— summarily nominated for deletion. I am leaving you this message to offer you some well-intentioned advice which should help prevent this from happening in the future.

First, you really should review the Wikipedia definition of what it takes for something to notable. You should begin by checking out WP:GNG and making sure you understand what it means for a subject to have reliable, independent, verifiable sources to support its claim of notability. You should also have a look at WP:NOT to get a good sense of what Wikipedia is NOT (because it is NOT several very important things!). Lastly, I'd like to suggest that rather than diving in by creating an article, you start by making edits to already existing articles and seeing how they are formatted and how their claims are supported. Whether it is just a typo you see that needs correcting, or a sentence, or a paragraph, start with something smaller than creating a whole article. Then, as your confidence builds, you can consider putting together an article that is structured like other Wikipedia articles and which won't, hopefully, result in a deletion nomination!

If you have any questions about this or would like to contact me, please leave me a message on my talk page by clicking on the green word that says, "Talk" here by my signature and editing the page that then appears. "Sign" your comment at the end with four tildes, like this: ~ so I can see who you are. But all of this is entirely optional, of course.

Best of luck to you, and please don't let this deletion nomination keep you from wanting to contribute in the future. It shouldn't. KDS 4444  Talk  04:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * By the way, to link to another Wikipedia article you need to use the following syntax: Article, which yields Article. To add custom link text, use the syntax Description which yields Description. And Wikipedia can't recursively use itself as a reference; see the policy of verifiability. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2015 (UTC)