User talk:JasonNolan64

Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3
See WP:AN3. An editor claims you are edit warring at American Ninja Warrior. You may respond if you wish, at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page American Ninja Warrior has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. ''While sometimes edits can be frustrating to see, yelling in the edit summary does little to help the problem. If needed, there are dispute resolution procedures that can be used. I would first try to discuss the issue on the talk page.'' 331dot (talk) 23:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

ANI Notice
Hey Jason - friendly notice that I've mentioned you in a discussion at WP:ANI; I've brought up the IP editor who has been vandalising American Ninja Warriors. Thanks. ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 03:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * As an update: American Ninja Warrior, along with a few other articles, has been semi-protected to prevent abusive IP editing. If you see what appears to be the same editor adding false information again, feel free to let me know. Thanks, ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 20:48, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ninja Warrior UK Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ninja Warrior UK Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I see you're still edit warring there. Drmies (talk) 19:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

American Ninja Warrior edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on American Ninja Warrior. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ping me with &#123;&#123;u&#124;Jim1138&#125;&#125; and sign "&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;" or message me on my talk page. 03:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Really. Use wp:rfpp. Cheers Ping me with &#123;&#123;u&#124;Jim1138&#125;&#125; and sign "&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;" or message me on my talk page. 15:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List Of Obstacles On American Ninja Warrior for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List Of Obstacles On American Ninja Warrior is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List Of Obstacles On American Ninja Warrior until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   23:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

American Ninja Warrior obstacles
Hi Jason. To clarify on the list of obstacles on American Ninja Warrior, the reason that keeps getting removed is not because it's false. It's because it's completely trivial for a general encyclopedia. Overall, a giant list of obstacles in each season isn't useful. Like we don't provide in-depth coverage of video game plots, or a list of every single question asked on Jeopardy, we also shouldn't and will not keep a giant list of obstacles from a show. If you take a look at the deletion debate, you'll see that there's a strong consensus towards not included such content. I've removed the content again, and advise you to not re-add it. Continuing to do so without first discussing it can be considered edit warring and may result in a block. If you have a case to make, feel free to bring it up on the article's talk page where there is already a discussion. If you have any questions, feel free to ask here. Thanks. ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 21:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Damn Edit Wars/Bullies
Hi there Jason, Look I knew we have been on some bad terms, but there are bigger bullies out there that have picking on users like us. Like Seriously, the people who god rid of the ANW obstacles have OCD and just want to keep on getting rid of them. I suggest that people should know about sasukepedia, which is a better site for info for ANW. I'm sick of people undoing edits that deserve to be there and are correct. A Giant list of obstacles is useful to let people know what the obstacles are. I know how hard you worked on trying to protect and keep List of Obstacles on ANW. People who just keep editing the page, don't even watch the show at all. And I hope you read this to know, that I'm on your side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:84:4100:FAFD:5DB1:D51E:9CE:4F6D (talk) 06:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 22:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)