User talk:Jason Alsh

National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Catholic Church, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 06:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Related to this, I noticed you changed the spelling of a word in Religion in Italy from British to American English (baptised > baptized). That article is marked to use British English, therefore I've reverted your change. Please ensure that you follow the English variety setting of an article, or where this is absent, the wider WP guideline linked to above. Thank you. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm IamNotU. I noticed that you recently removed content from Independent State of Croatia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IamNotU (talk) 19:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Independent State of Croatia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. ''The reason given for the removal of the content and the citation was not valid. The source you deleted meets Wikipedia's criteria for reliability, and states in part: "For the Ustaše, religion and nationality were closely linked; Catholicism and Islam were declared to be the national religions of the Croatian people, while Orthodoxy was initially described as inherently incompatible with the Croation state project. ... Starčević's idea that the Bosnian Muslims were the "purest" Croats was resurrected, and Muslims were given permission to build mosques in Zagreb and elsewhere in the country." This is confirmed, with citations of other reliable sources, in several other parts of the article. Please do not make changes based on your own point of view, that are not verified by citing a reliable, published source, and ensure that future edits conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Thank you.'' IamNotU (talk) 01:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)