User talk:Jasonhunterdesign

Your edit to List of social networking websites
Welcome, and thanks for your edit to List of social networking websites. Unfortunately it had to be reverted, because the website you added to the list does not have a Wikipedia article. Please write the article first, or post to Requested articles requesting that it be created. Please make sure that the article follows Wikipedia guidelines, especially as concerns verifiability and reliable sources. If the website is not notable according to the Wikipedia definition, it shouldn't have an article and neither should it be in the list. Thank you! --Bonadea (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Generation 21
A tag has been placed on Generation 21, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Obviously writing in the first person ("our mission") is shooting oneself in the foot as far as Wikipedia is concerned. You declare your COI and scream "spam" at us. You have the right to raise the matter at deletion review. But before you do, at least create a draft that contains some independent references to the notability of the website. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)