User talk:Jasonlenik

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Stem cell (computing)


A tag has been placed on Stem cell (computing), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Stem cell (computing) and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 16:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Jason. On the subject of the article, first, the article comes off as rather promotional - which is something known to happen with new or smallish anything. It's a bit of a challenge to do this. Moreover, however, is your assertion that it is new technology - and the problem here is that it is, by its very nature, going to lack notability. We require notability to go in here, and to be frank, no encyclopedia will accept anything that is just something new, no matter how innovative it is. So this said, the trick for this is to demonstrate notability with reliable sources - if you do this successfully, the promotional language should more or less go away. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 18:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)