User talk:Jasonlin1216

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ronny02.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Ronny02.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kids' WB, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kids' WB was changed by Jasonlin1216 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-08-04T19:45:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to The CW4Kids constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ  19:47, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to The CW4Kids. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —  Jeff G. ツ  19:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to The CW4Kids. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Donald Duck (talk) 19:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2011 (UTC)