User talk:Jasonski

Hey Mods, someone is making multiple false accounts pretending to be me, and to avoid anymore conflict and problems please deactivate my account. Sorry for causing so many problems I started off as a Wiki-editor with big hopes but turned the wrong path, sorry for everything. Goodbye Wikipedia it was real. Jasonski (talk) 00:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Jasonski, you are invited to the Teahouse!
I am back.

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to R. A. Dickey has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: R. A. Dickey was changed by Jasonski (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907284 on 2016-04-17T00:25:18+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. KH-1 (talk) 03:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Brett Cecil with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 02:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

""
 * That's not a very convincing unblock request. If you indicate that you might disrupt Wikipedia, you won't be unblocked to begin with. There's an extensive set of directions on how you might prove good faith directly above. Please review them.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

re

Sir, the point I was trying to make by saying that is that I won't make the same mistake because I really don't want to be blocked, and I'm very keen on helping any pages that need assistance. I promise I won't make another disruptive edit again, you have my word. I honestly think I've turned the corner, and I promise to help this wonderful site. Jasonski (talk) 18:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Am I permanently blocked? Jasonski (talk) 01:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

A guy saved by Jesus I promise this Jasonski 2 isn't me, help I'm being framed I have no idea who he is Jasonski (talk) 00:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)



August 2016
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Neil N  talk to me 01:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)