User talk:Jasper23/Archive 01Oct

Redneck
Be sure to check talk before reverting my edit. Thanks, and have a good week!Rsm99833 18:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * My error. sorry about that. Please revert to previous version w/ my blessing (for whatever that is worth. Should have had my coffee first before doing the edit. Rsm99833 18:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Removed
I have removed all the warnings. I apologize for the warring and I hope you can forgive me. Thank you. American Patriot 1776 03:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I also apologize for the one warning template I left on the page. I did not fully understand the situation when I left the warning, and therefore should of never left it. --Wildnox 06:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Hi, Jasper23. I see you haven't posted in a while. I hope you haven't left over this stressful business, and that you'll see AP1776's nice message above. The conflict on your page has been discussed on Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Bishonen | talk 10:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC).

Your comment
I just wanted you to know that your comment made my day. Well... since its right before midnight, we'll just say that it has made me not only very happy but very, very, relieved. ;) American Patriot 1776 04:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Democratic National Committee
Apparently, there are no moderators at Wikipedia. I reverted again because if you take a look at Vandalism it clearly states that blanking (wholesale deletion) of all or part of a page is considered vandalism and a violation of Wikipedia standards. Technically, this is not even a case for moderation. Your actions are cause for, at minimum, a temporary suspention of your account. I will wait for a moderator to eventually come along, but you will lose your case. Especially, considering you keep saying you want to discuss the issue and find a compromise, yet have not offered a single actionable compromise to implement, while I have compromised and shortened the section down to a single sentence and link. --Jayzel 17:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Lose what case?

Its only mediation. Do you think we are going to court? What is the deal with your attitude? We would have had this settled a long time ago if only you knew how to interact with good faith editors. Read back through your comments and look at your aggressive behaviour. Thats why we havent compromised and thats why I will no longer talk to you except through a moderator. Jasper23 01:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked user
Jasper, I can see from Talk:Democratic National Committee that you have good reason to be exasperated with Jayzel, and that you've been very patient most of the time. But I'd really appreciate it if you didn't turn up in an argumentative way on his page while he's blocked. Please remember he's confined to it. If you take it off your watchlist and just don't go there, there's nothing he can do to aggravate you. A blocked user is at such a disadvantage, and (understandably) so likely to be in a foul mood, that I think it's better to simply ignore any incivility from them. Best wishes, Bishonen | talk 18:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC).

Yes, of course. I will refrain from further edits to his watch page. Jasper23 18:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Democratic National Committee MedCab Case
Hi, regarding the MedCab case for the Democratic National Committee, I am going to be the mediator. The discussion is going to be initially on the talk page, when all parties to the mediation are ready. Addhoc 11:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I have sources.
Using sites like Ontheissues, among other sites, I have sources for these. Thanks for your concern, though. It never hurts to be sure. And I say "Fixing" on some (I stopped leaving reasons altogether as most changes were very minor) because the names attached attached to the categories at the bottom were usually appearing on the respective category pages as First name, last name, rather than the proper contrary way. Gunsnroads 03:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Gunsnroads

Answering your question
To answer the question you asked elsewhere: Here is the gist of being "Jewish" for Wikipedia purposes (or being "Italian-American", "Irish-American", etc.). If a reputable source called a person "Jewish", regardless of whether that person's mother, father, or paternal great-grandfather was Jewish, then they are Jewish for Wikipedia purposes unless there is an equally or more reliable source that says they are "not Jewish". This is the same for any X-American label. I believe there are sources - mostly excited headlines, stuff like - that call George Felix Allen "Jewish", therefore it is fine under WP:V and WP:NOR. If a reliable source calls a person "Jewish", regardless of who their mother was or was not, Wikipedia can (and should?) call them that, Cheers Mad Jack 08:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Obama and Webb
Obama's opposition is stated in here http://www.renewamerica.us/archives/media/debates/04_10_26debate3.htm Webb's opposition is stated in here http://blog.washingtonpost.com/richmondreport/2006/03/gay_marriage_sidestep.html Gunsnroads 08:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Bill Clinton
Great boldness shown in brutally culling iffy content on such a high-profile article. I've begun in a small part adding trivia facts to relevant sectons or other articles (eg. ) and hope you will do the same. Good work. Harr o 5 08:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Jasper23! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. &mdash;Xyrael / 16:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Clinton Counterterrorism
It's okay&mdash;I took no offense. I understood yout concern and didn't intend my reply to be negative. I've been working on it since the interview on Fox, but I didn't want to put it into the article unto I had all my facts straight and my sources correct, because I know that if I had posted it without it being completed, there would have been plenty of complaints about citing sources and the like. Thank's for your response. Mtmdem 14:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Removing cited sources on Webb's article
So, even though Allen's page has a discussion on his racism controversies, you decided a sourced (washington post) mention of Webb's alleged racism couldn't be on his page as well. Way to be fair.

Did you read my edit summary? Have you been following the discussion on the talk page? Do you even care? Jasper23 20:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Scribner
Regarding Scribners actions on the ACLU article:

I will see how Scribner responds. He already refused to address the bogus 9.5 Million dollar claim, but added it back into the article. He also keeps repeatedly deleting my well sourced and documented 'religious liberties' section. He also has accused you and me of being sock puppets. I'm having a hard time AGF in light of his actions. Did you know he asked to have the article protected? He did so AFTER I asked for peer review. His motives are suspect NBGPWS 03:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Warning
Jasper, you and Scribner seem engaged in adding warnings to each other's talkpages and reverting to keep them there. Please stop your part in this futile exercise, and don't post on Scribner's page at all unless it's necessary. A 3RR warning would qualify as "necessary", but note that there's no need to insist he keeps the warning on his page for 24 hours; it's in the History. Well, you know how I feel about trying to make people keep unwanted edits on their pages. Bishonen | talk 08:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC).


 * Point taken. I will of course take heed of your suggestion in the future. Could you possibly keep an eye on the general situation. If you arent to busy of course. Thanks.

Jasper23 08:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course. I've got both pages on my watchlist. Bishonen | talk 09:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC).

Re: Weasel words
The who template is also useful when they use terms like "some people" or "others say", but I'm not sure if they have templates for any other weasel words. --Lethargy 21:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

ACLU
Thank you for inviting me to continue helping on the ACLU pages. I'm new to Wiki and don't feel very comfortable yet, so I'll do my best to keep contributing. --Lorraine LeBeau 17:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

say what?
last I checked others were reverting my edits. Devilmaycares 04:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

stalking
believe it or not I really don't like stalkers.

could you please just consider for a second though the possibility that I might be right about the person who is in effect running dkosopedia? Devilmaycares 04:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

ok, so what? Jasper23 04:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Well there's more evidence of his political orientation but if I provide it there's a strong chance I'll end up divulging info on me. Any ideas? Devilmaycares 04:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Seriously, Why? Who cares? To be honest this whole conversation is a little creepy. Jasper23 04:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah it is a buit creepy but I find it disturbing when people want to call a guy who called for world wide enternal revolution a peacemaker on par with Martin Luther King. Devilmaycares 04:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

AIM
Do you have an AIM screen name? It is getting late and I have school in the morning, besides, AIM will make things much easier and we can come to a conclusion much faster. Shakam 05:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

RFC Barack Obama
I'm not quite sure how the "Request for Comment" works, but you can submit it wherever it is supposed to go. You won't be stealing any thunder, but I won't let the lead paragraph stay the same as it is. Shakam 15:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)