User talk:Jasper Deng/Archive 20

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 14:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

looking at the history of my chess game page
I find it interesting how so far my edit summaries have all been using long algebraic and yours have all been using short algebraic. :-) Double sharp (talk) 06:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I never saw the value in longer notation xD.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, if anything, it's certainly unambiguous, which might come in handy if we mess up the board. But yeah, it's not too necessary. Double sharp (talk) 07:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy holidays


''' JianhuiMobile talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. ''' JianhuiMobile talk 07:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Declined speedy of Wikipedia talk:Advertising program
Hi Jasper. I've declined your speedy of Wikipedia talk:Advertising program. There was nothing particularly wrong with your request, it's just that if the template vandalism is reinserted then the page will be recreated. At this point, having a notice at the top of the page is likely to result in less confusion. Once we're sure that the template vandalism that links to that page stops, we can speedy the page again. Thanks! --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 10:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Happy Holidays, Jasper Deng! Keep up the very good work here on Wikipedia! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year!


 Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

 Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 09:39, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Bye
Sorry Jasp, didn't have the heart to tell you good-bye, and I won't be online anymore. Situation changed for the worse. Take care, Danger^Mouse (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=593251885 your edit] to Volumetric flow rate may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * \cdot R - r \cdot \theta_1) - \frac{T}{2 \pi} ( - ( \cos { \theta_2}) \cdot R - r \cdot \theta_2 )

Well - it wouldn't have been a tunnel the entire way, but there were plans discused for some tunnel segments of the ten mile gap. You're right though it didn't mention that in the linked article.Corsair1944 (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata/interlanguage query
Hi Jasper. I wonder whether you might be able to lend a hand with something that's a bit (a lot, actually) outside my comfort zone? I'm doing some work on the en-wiki article Juldarigi, and would like to add an interwiki link to ko-wiki's article 줄다리기. Unfortunately, that article already links to the en-wiki page Tug of war, and so I can't add it to the Juldarigi page. I've had a read of WP:Interwiki conflicts, which frankly I can't make head nor tail of, and H:IL isn' a lot of help. I've never taken the plunge into Wikidata so I'm frankly scared to try coming up with a solution there, in case I accidentally break the internet or something... could you explain to me how to fix the problem? Cheers, Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  11:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Interwiki conflicts can be pretty tricky (sorry for the late reply). The question is mostly a content one: which enwiki article is the kowiki article closest to?--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The images would suggest Tug of war, but the content is actually much closer to Juldarigi (at least from what Google Translate can tell me). Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  09:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

HP OneView page
Hi Jasper,

I am attempting to create the page on HP OneView. I understand the notability guidelines and feel that HP OneView meets these guidelines because it has been widely reported on by the media.

If you could please let me know piece by piece where you feel the article is overly promotional, I will address it. I have backed up almost every sentence with citations that meet Wikipedia guidelines, so it would be helpful to know where you feel the entry falls short.

Regards,ITwriter47 (talk) 21:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the entirety of what you wrote reads like it was copy-pasted from a company website (I assume you are aware of rules regarding plagiarism). There is never a need to say "integrated", "portfolio", or any other typical IT marketing terms. They tend to be vague or otherwise too promotional. I know you're new and sometimes I feel like we ask a lot for articles, but organizing it by product is not the way layout works on Wikipedia. Read existing well-written software articles for examples.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm happy to remove the terms you feel are overly promotional and vague, such as integrate and portfolio. I would appreciate your expertise as to how I can improve the article to meet Wikipedia standards. I have made an effort to include a source for every opinion in the article. I noticed that according to your profile, you wrote an article about Windows Server 2012. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2012 I am confused, because this article seems to be organized around a product. Regards, ITwriter47 (talk) 00:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * But notice that I did not section it by product edition or component (the components are subsections under features); also it's one piece of software, not several.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Curious
Hello Jasper, just curious about this short-lived notice on my talk page. Can I found out any more about it, like who may have filed and whether there was some discussion that I ought to read? Thanks and best regards,  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  15:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Ah, I think I found something. Was it Altimgamr pretending to be someone called Randy Pobst? Thanks again,  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  15:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The sock created an RfA "for you", so that was my initial reason for suspecting you, but quickly the evidence turned otherwise.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

RFA
Sorry - hadn't realised my laptop had logged me out - have signed in and tidied my support vote - cheers!  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 09:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No problems, it looked like someone logged out to me anyways.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Reno TV articles
Thanks for the help here; as you've maybe seen, I've blocked the range that you suggested. I'm sorry that I needed to request your help, but I've read and reread the rangeblocking pages (both IPV$ and IPV^) plenty of times without being able to figure things out, and rangeblocking quintillions of IP addresses based solely on my own initiative would have been reckless and very far indeed from a proper application of WP:BOLD. As WP:RANGE says, "you need some knowledge of how networks and IP address numbering work", and I don't have that knowledge, so it's just a ton safer to follow your instructions than to go ahead with what sounds best to me. Nyttend (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Happy Wiki-Birthday!
I noticed that, according to your user page, you are celebrating your Wiki-Birthday today (3 May 2014). Happy Wiki-Birthday! RomanSpa (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

My RfA
I said I would explain with greater detail why I understood your viewpoint. I can be found on my discussion page.--that annoying guy who shows up sometimes because... you know, bored (talk) 03:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki.org
Answered. Cheers   ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪    02:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation
Jasper, I would like to take this moment and thank you for taking part in my RfA that happened a while ago. Although it didn't turn out as I had planned, I certainly appreciated all the comments and suggestions given by you and other people. I will learn from all of them and will hopefully run again someday when I'm fully ready. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 13:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

A year and a half after you opposed my RfA
I am inviting you to leave me some feedback, 18 months after you opposed my RfA. Do you still believe I am not fit to be an admin? Do you believe I have been able to improve past the concerns you have brought up? Do not be afraid of being too harsh, I am specifically welcoming criticism as I believe it is the best way to improve and I am always looking to learn from my mistakes. I am particularly looking for feedback as to whether you have objections to myself lifting the self-imposed 1RR restriction I had agreed to towards the end of my RfA. If you don't have time to comment, don't fret it either, this is nothing I'll lose sleep over. :) ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  19:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * well, this 1RR restriction is enough to satisfy my oppose, which mainly was a reluctant agreement with that edit warring incident.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Filter bug blocking edits to a page
Hi Jasper, I'm sorry if it's improper to contact you about this. I'm new to Wikipedia editing and saw your name on the filter false positives page so I thought you might be able to look into this problem for me.

It concerns filter 225, "Vandalism in all caps", and the WTFPL FOSS license page. Because the WTFPL license contains blocks of text that are in ALL CAPS, this filter is throwing false positives all over the place, even on some edits that don't seem to touch the license text itself.

I already filed a false positive report for the edit I made but that's not what I'm contacting you about. I was wondering if you could do anything to either improve the filter itself or whitelist the WTFPL article in some fashion so that it can be maintained without tripping the "all caps" filter? I mean, if the article is supposed to contain all caps, it makes no sense for a vandalism filter blocking all caps to be applied to it. I'm a law student and I have a lot of interest in FOSS licensing. I've studied the WTFPL, various GPLs, and other "copyleft" licenses and would like to improve how the articles for these licenses-- particularly the more obscure ones like WTFPL-- are maintained. But this filter is a prohibitively massive roadblock to that. Is there anything you can do; and, if not, can you recommend anything at least? Thanks! Por1h0s (talk) 22:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The filter only looks for new edits containing the offending text. After you make a few more edits, the filter should no longer cause issues, as it's mainly geared towards new accounts or logged-out editors. Whitelisting the license pages might just encourage such users to vandalize those pages in this fashion.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

It appears that there is some confusion. You sent me a message on my board dated January 2013. I never vandalised anything as I last use this account in 2006. Sorry.86.161.159.79 (talk) 23:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Piccici De Rothschild
FYI... You were. There was also an ? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No that was not me, not, nor . Any edits I make on vacation will be from either this account or .--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:50, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

extreme temperatures for Tehachapi, California
If you go to the WRCC website and click on the "Temperature" link in the "General Climate Summary Tables" section of the sidebar, you will see that the records go back to 1893. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a direct link. Best regards, —Stepheng3 (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:XxXx$$ YOLOSWAG420BLAZEIT $$xXxX


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 06:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't contest it. The only reason why I didn't nominate it myself was that the vandal would probably just recreate it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Excuse me, but
When is a virtual desktop not a virtual desktop? ViperSnake151  Talk  01:09, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * To me, a true virtual desktop has always been one in the sense of virtualization. But I should've read the article first.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:31, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

IPv6 prefix overly blocked
Hi Jasper,

I am aware that the blocking policy is set by each individual part of wikipedia (what a nice mess) but can you possibly forward this message to the right people so that they exempt the 2001:1af8:fe00::/39?

We have attempted to provide details at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jasper_Deng/IPv6

to get IPv6 in a better 'blocking' state, that is so that the admins know what to block and who to contact.

Unfortunately it seems that even though for instance:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2001:1AF8:FE00:845E:0:0:1:10

is banned because of:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2001:1AF8:0:0:0:0:0:0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1AF8:4700:A05A:1:0:0:256

That is a complete /32 being blocked.

Note that the /39 that SixXS uses out of that /32 is in RIPE whois:

inet6num:      2001:1af8:fe00::/39 netname:       SIXXS-NLHAA01 descr:         LEASEWEB BV -- IPv6 deployment descr:         SixXS allocation for LEASEWEB BV POP

Hence, querying it should lead you to abuse@sixxs.net for any abuse there, next to the fact that we noted it on the above page.

Indeed the remainder of that /32 is not registered in whois; that does not mean there are no more specifics like that /39.

Can you please exempt the 2001:1af8:fe00::/39 used by users of nlhaa01 (https://www.sixxs.net/pops/leaseweb/) as these are actual users, not hosted customers like the rest of that /32?

Jeroen (talk) 09:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC) (info@sixxs.net for email, likely easier than this wiki for communications...)
 * We have a : Special:BlockList/2001:1af8:fe00::/39. Unfortunately it is not possible at this time to exempt subranges from a rangeblock. Individual users can request exemptions on a per-account basis by requesting IP block exemption. I would advise contacting the blocking administrator about the block if you feel that it is excessive.--Jasper Deng (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That is a block for the whole /32 of Leaseweb, which is indeed primarily a hosting company. The 2001:1af8:fe00::/39 out of that is for SixXS though which are endusers. I'll see if Elockid is willing to resolve this problem properly... Jeroen (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Microsoft Windows#Genealogy
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Microsoft Windows. Thanks. Fleet Command (talk) 14:39, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Re:
No, that was vandalism. The edit was based upon leaked information which has not yet been independently verified or confirmed, and was being hosted by a random blog, which in turn, supposedly got the document from a borderline warez forum. Plus, you're not supposed to directly mention the names of seasons in articles relating to regionally-neutral topics. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Vandalism by definition is clearly in bad faith. I don't see that here.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

2014 South Napa earthquake
The edit you reverted was unreferenced and poorly written. However, I can assure you that there is no doubt whatsoever that hundreds of buildings were severely damaged in this earthquake, and thousands suffered moderate damage. I live close to epicenter of the earthquake, and have been looking around and observing and photographing the damage for over three months. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Hacked

 * in which case, unfortunately, we may have to still block your account indefinitely until you can prove to us that you're the rightful owner.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:41, 15 December 2014 (UTC)