User talk:Jasper reed

Speedy deletion of Jasper reed
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Jasper reed, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Killiondude (talk) 00:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Adam kobeissi
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Adam kobeissi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Adam kobeissi is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Adam kobeissi, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to James warshaw has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 01:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)