User talk:Jaspreet khera

Welcome!
Hello, Jaspreet khera, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Hazal Kaya have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. clpo13(talk) 17:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Hazal Kaya. Thank you. Chris vLS (talk) 18:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Just to clrify, I see that you added the |beauty-around source your edit. However, that site is not what Wikipedia considers a reliable source, in fact even that source simply says "they say" she had two affairs. That is not enough proof that it is true. If Wikipedia put rumors into the encyclopedia, it would not be trusted by readers -- and it could be sued for publishing untrue material. In addition, it appears that you copy-and-pasted some of the text, which can constitute a copyright violation, which also threatens the viability of the encyclopedia and is unfair to the original authors. Thanks. Chris vLS (talk) 18:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)