User talk:JassenMarang17

Nomination of Kabomania for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kabomania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kabomania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  // Timothy ::  talk  18:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Comment
 * Hello,
 * I genuinely hope you don't find this deletion discussion discouraging, although I know from experience this is hard to do. Please contribute to the discussion on the nomination page. It's certainly possible it will not be deleted if you make a good case for notability and others agree with you. Writing an article can be very difficult; if you're new to Wikipedia and it often takes some time and experience before success.
 * I believe it would be very helpful for you to study some guidelines about creating articles and subject notability. These are a good place to start: WP:N, especially the section on WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, WP:WWIN, WP:NOTEVERYTHING, WP:RS, WP:V. Often there are specific notability guidelines for certain subjects such as people WP:NPEOPLE and organizations / corporations WP:NORG. You can view a full listing of the subject notability guidelines (SNG) at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines.
 * If there is anything I can do to help, please let me know and I genuinely do hope you're not discouraged. Best wishes from Los Angeles,  // Timothy ::  talk  20:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Kabomania. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Kabomania. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Persima Majalengka for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persima Majalengka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Persima Majalengka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Kabomania, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 04:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Persima Majalengka. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 04:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Kabomania. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 07:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Persima Majalengka. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 07:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Persima Majalengka, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paulo Gali


A tag has been placed on Paulo Gali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronaldo Kwateh
Hello JassenMarang17,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ronaldo Kwateh for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Paulo Gali, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paulo Gali


A tag has been placed on Paulo Gali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elang Bondol Stadium


The article Elang Bondol Stadium has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "NGEO"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  08:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Elang Bondol Stadium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elang Bondol Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elang Bondol Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  09:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Elang Bondol Stadium. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 06:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Elang Bondol Stadium while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  08:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

West Bogor Regency moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, West Bogor Regency, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Karawang language moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Karawang language, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I wasn't able to verify the existance of this language in scholarly sources or in the sources cited. Note that blogs aren't usable as sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nathaniel Agbozo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathaniel Agbozo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Agbozo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Nathaniel Agbozo. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently creating new pages that qualify for deletion, ignoring community concerns about the behavior and actively, persistently removing the resulting deletion discussion templates. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Kingdom of Kaimana moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kingdom of Kaimana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

ToBeFree
Tolong buka blokir akun gw dong cuk JassenMarang17 (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Karawang language
Hello, JassenMarang17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karawang language, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhayangkara Solo FC logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bhayangkara Solo FC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Jajang Surahman&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Jajang Surahman. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 01:49, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:West Bogor Regency
Hello, JassenMarang17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:West Bogor Regency, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)