User talk:Jassykaur

Welcome!
Hello, Jassykaur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ankit Gupta, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - MrX 19:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Untitled
Hey there Ponyo ,I m appreciating dat u explained me the things on Article Ankit Gupta But I m following the guidlines and about copyright things i m not getting which website post copyright pics of some star and if they do ..they do not matc to the wikipedia copyright criteria and okie lets not talk about Image and i will not put twitter links there but still why you updated other updates even reference links ....Ankit Gupta is new actor and i am in contact with the person and i m not getting which kind of referencing you all want.its really disheartening act for me and suggest me if other than i can add information other than pictures and external links

````
 * You are not following the guidelines, nor the policies I've pointed out to you. You continue to add personal information sourced to filmyfolks.com. This is a tertiary compendia-type source (not unlike IMDb) and does not meet Wikipedia's reliable sourcing criteria. In addition, you continue to add promotionally-toned material to the articles. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that includes notable facts about notable people, it is not a vehicle for promoting the individual by including commentary such as "He always dreamed to became a successful actor. Now that dream has came true...". If you are in contact with Ankit Gupta than you have a conflict of interest and should not be editing the article directly at all.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Ohkkk fine ... if dat content seemed promotional content I will not add ..that's it and talking about reliable sources what kind of realable source I m not getting Sir /Mam. Any actor who started initially does not have biorgraphies and Filmy folks is a site where information about all actors available and if wikipedia is asking for reliable source than i think we need to present the person visually in front of admins. Wiki guidlines are so cumbersome that anybody can get confused and i m getting confused. and Conflict of interest Nothing like that. Anybody can handle anybody's page and you are true its encyclopedia means collection of huge information then why can't we add appropriate one that is true and i have checked many articles and i edited my article accordingly so that i can work finely.Have checked ur created pages also u ar experienced one and i am new one so will get time to learn the things and final is i will not add any kinda stuff but You can't Del the page coz other details are basic and please if u can help me regarding reliable source which is confusing me still ...Sorry but i have lots and lots of queries. Jassykaur (talk) 17:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Regarding your comment "Any actor who started initially does not have biorgraphies (sic)", an actor must have coverage in reliable independent sources in order to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for inclusion. Websites such as filmyfolks.com allow for user-generated content and pull information from various sources of varying reliability. They cannot be trusted to be accurate. Have you read WP:RS and WP:BLP? This isn't a social networking or promotional site, it is an encylcopedia on notable topics. And no, anyone cannot "handle anyone's page". Did you read the Conflict of Interest guidelines? As you have a relationship with the subject you should not be editing the article; at most you should be suggesting updates via the talk page as described in the guideline. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ankit Gupta


The article Ankit Gupta has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. - MrX 19:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Inappropriate edits
I have reverted your edits to Ankit Gupta for several reasons: Please ensure you review the policies and guidelines linked above prior to editing the article further.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) You introduced unsourced and poorly sourced personal information
 * 2) You added promotionally-toned non-neutral material
 * 3) You re-uploaded a copyright violating image to Commons, falsely claiming the image as your "own work", and restored it to the article.
 * 4) You added a semi--protection request to an article page
 * 5) You added a section based on your own observations and opinions

Proposed deletion of Parth Samthaan


The article Parth Samthaan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 19:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)