User talk:Jaswilsox

The Working Stiffs
--—— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk  -  09:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You added an article on The Working Stiffs to Template:Userpage/doc; this is not an article page, so your edits have been reverted.
 * The Working Stiffs appear to be a local garage band; as such, they do not meet the notability standards per Notability (music).

Proposed deletion of Keith Wyatt


The article Keith Wyatt has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  ttonyb (talk) 19:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keith Wyatt


The article Keith Wyatt has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  ttonyb (talk) 23:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Keith Wyatt, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.  ttonyb (talk) 23:19, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Keith Wyatt. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Smokizzy (talk) 23:22, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Keith Wyatt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  ttonyb (talk) 23:26, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Keith Wyatt - Germany 2009.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Keith Wyatt - Germany 2009.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 23:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  ttonyb (talk) 23:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Keith_Wyatt_-_Germany_2009.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Keith_Wyatt_-_Germany_2009.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 23:33, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 12 hours, for repeated removal of maintenance templates after multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   01:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Keith Wyatt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith Wyatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Keith Wyatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Star  Mississippi  14:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't understand why you are objecting to Keith Wyatt's Wikipedia listing. Keith was an instructor at Musicians Institute from roughly 1979 to 2017, where he worked with some of the best guitar players to have ever lived (including Howard Roberts and Tommy Tedesco). Keith is also the guitar player in the band The Blasters, which is internationally known. I'm guessing that the objection is administrative since there is no reason to object to his listing. Jaswilsox (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to weigh in at the discussion, but I would recommend reading up on musical and academic notability to see whether Wyatt meets those. Star   Mississippi  22:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)