User talk:Jat1321

May 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Khizr Khan, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.


 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for informing, I will make alterations and cite the source Jat1321 (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Firoz Shah Tughlaq. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Packer&#38;Tracker (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Saadullah Khan (Mughal Empire), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Packer&#38;Tracker (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Khokhar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. please don't edit war, the dynasty is a Sayyid dynasty, the possibilities to the background has been shared on the dynasty page. There is no reason to add this dynasty on Khokhar based on Eaton, most other writers don't say the same. Akalanka820 (talk) 11:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * @Akalanka820 Go argue with Digby or Eaton
 * I only cited their books Jat1321 (talk) 12:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * there are various such references. As we can see Eaton's point is already added on main dynasty page. You cannot use that to add it everywhere, when there are lots of contrary references to it. Here- : and many such references.  Akalanka820 (talk) 12:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * now please stop adding stuffs which look like pov. A writer took a different stand than others doesn't mean you can use it on all pages to push it. The points of Eaton are added on main dynasty page. Thanks Akalanka820 (talk) 12:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Akalanka820 Sure, Thanks Jat1321 (talk) 12:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Packer&#38;Tracker (talk) 12:33, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. PS:- The author you cited was a Civil servant in Raj era, apart from being obviously dated/archaic, it's not a WP:HISTRS to push for such absurd claims. ∆ P&#38;t ♀√ (talk) 04:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I have reverted your edit on Khokhar page, you added it even after explaining you the counter viewpoint to it here- [], only Eaton and Digby took a different line, other writers aren't saying the same. Please, stop pushing a particular pov based on just 2 writers contrary to what it has been on the main Sayyid Dynasty page. Akalanka820 (talk) 07:47, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop removing information based on the way you view topics
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gujarat Sultanate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. You removed information that was properly cited based on the way you view the topic. At least three sources were given from recognized authors, you removed them. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 19:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @GujaratiHistoryinDNA I believe you have left the message on the wrong page because I have not removed anything from that page
 * Thanks and Regards Jat1321 (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)