User talk:Jat32

Please do not add commercial links &mdash; or links to your own private websites &mdash; to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Aapo Laitinen 12:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for paying attention. Writing about people, companies, events etc. you are associated with is not forbidden. Feel free further edit and improve the articles you've started, but carefully maintain the neutral point of view. Some further suggestions: Thanks for your time! Aapo Laitinen 13:09, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Do not copy and paste material from other websites, even if you were the author of the said material. Promotional copy is not suitable for an encyclopedia article.
 * Make sure your intention is to inform, not promote. Write the text with this intention in mind. Back any assertions with facts.
 * Pay attention to how you name articles. The real, authorative, whatchamacallit name should contain the content. Alternative spellings should be made redirects.
 * Consider contributing to articles related to your expertise in ways that have no relation to the said people, companies, events etc. This helps us to know that you are interested in making Wikipedia more useful to everyone, and not attempting to use it to your advantage.

Please do not paste material from other sites to this one. You've had more than adequate instruction in that regard. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Notability of James A. Tunick
A tag has been placed on James A. Tunick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 01:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

The subject is notable as he and his work have been published in multiple books and has his name on multiple patents and news articles. Please read the post more carefully. As per your rules, "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published[3] secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,[4] and independent of the subject.[5]" -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

{unblock|The subject is notable as he and his work have been published in multiple books and has his name on multiple patents and news articles. Please read the post more carefully. As per your rules, "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published[3] secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,[4] and independent of the subject.[5]" -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)}

There are a couple of problems here. First, there's the issue of copyright violations. Even if the text is yours, it can't be used here without first releasing it to this site's license. It then voids your original copyright. Second, assuming you're the subject of the article, there's a problem with conflict of interest, outlined at WP:COI. All your edits seem to be self-promotional in violation of the guideline. I'll unblock you, but please read the COI link. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Burns


A tag has been placed on Red Burns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from More recently Professor Burns received a Lifetime Achievement Award from Canadian New Media. She was also an honoree at the Exploratorium’s 32nd Annual Awards Dinner honoring Women in Science and in 2005 she was added to the New York Women in Communications, Inc. Matrix Hall of Fame. Furthermore, in 2004, she was honored with a Distinguished Leadership Award for achievement in technology from the New York Hall of Science and in 2002 Professor Burns was a recipient of the Chrysler Design Award.[3]. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dog six (talk) 03:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Burns


A tag has been placed on Red Burns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://itp.nyu.edu/redburns/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dog six (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IMCexpo


The article IMCexpo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Zero evidence this was a notable event."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star  Mississippi  01:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)