User talk:Jatin0194

Welcome!
Hello, Jatin0194, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please look at the tags I have placed on your article and address the issues raised by consulting the wikipedia guidelines. Please do this as soon as possible, otherwise the article may be deleted.Deb (talk) 09:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Jesse Glick
I have made quite a few changes to the article you created to give it the best chance of avoiding nomination for deletion. I have done a search for reliable secondary sources to support notability but I can't find any. Personally I doubt the subject meets general notability guidelines ad I believe you are going to have trouble convincing other editors the subject is notable enough for an article at this point in time. Please do not hesitate to leave a message on my alk page if you need any help in the future. Best wishes, ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   10:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * deleted puffery and peacock words, see WP:PUFF and WP:PEACOCK.
 * deleted unreliable sources
 * removed duplicate information and simplified wording
 * reorganised sections and section titles


 * Thanks for doing that while I was off-line. Since the contributor says he has been getting information direct from the artist, there is also a conflict of interest.  Deb (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi. I think you're missing the point.  The artist has to fulfil the notability criteria and there have to be reliable third-party references to demonstrate this.  Please read the guidelines above and you will begin to see.Deb (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * IMDB is not generally considered a reliable reference, but it would not do any harm. Deb (talk) 12:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


 * After a quick search engine test, I didn't find enough to establish notability. That's not to say it will be speedily deleted, just that I couldn't put my hands on any RS in the time I had. I will keep the article in my watchlist. EBY (talk) 20:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Jesse Glick. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   01:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jesse Glick


The article Jesse Glick has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I really can't find enough good references to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jatin0194. I'm sorry to propose it for deletion. I looked for references but really can't find enough. Please, do your best to find good media references. Please see WP:42. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

User:Jesseglick8833
That page was made to appear as an article and to promote Glick which isn't allowed. I deleted it but preserved the content as a courtesy in case you want to add some of it to your article. It is now in a sandbox in your userspace at User:Jatin0194. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jesse Glick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesse Glick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles_for_deletion/Jesse_Glick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 07:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)