User talk:Jatin1219

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratapgarh Farms & Resorts (March 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratapgarh Farms & Resorts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pratapgarh_Farms_%26_Resorts Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pratapgarh_Farms_%26_Resorts reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Election results for Right to Recall party candidates
Hi, per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Indian_politics/Constituencies:_Article_structure, only candidates who get more than 1% of the votes, should be mentioned in the list. Please refrain from adding the election results for candidates who do not meet those criteria. Those rules mentioned were arrived at after a healthy discussion among members of the Indian politics Wikiproject. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi
 * Can you please provide a link of discussion where the said decision had been taken.
 * I can't find the said "healthy discussion" on official Indian politics wikiproject talk page.
 * Thanks. Jatin1219 (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It has since been archived. Here you go: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Indian_politics/Archive_3. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi
 * Thanks for bringing the above discussion in my knowledge. I have read the whole discussion and concluded that the result decided does not adhere the "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia" pillar among Five pillars. An Encyclopedia is a place where even the smallest and most basic information is available to public,the same goes for the wikipedia as it serves as a mean of information for general people.
 * As for election results, the information of all the big parties are available on every news platforms but the information about smaller candidates are not available to general public through mainstream sources. The news platforms are not Encyclopedias so they does not need to present such details but the wikipedia is an Encyclopedia that should account even the minute detail.
 * Untill the proposal of "mentioning only candidates who gets more then 1% votes" is admitted into wikipedia as an official policy,i will continue my work according to conscience.
 * Thanks and have a great day ahead. Jatin1219 (talk) 03:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll point out that there are constituencies where there are more than 20 or even 30 candidates for some elections. WP:NOTDIRECTORY might apply. You'd find less argument about adding results for a candidate from a party that is deemed notable (i.e. has a wikipedia page). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Maybe you can reopen the discussion on the Indian Politics Wikiproject. Please add your above argument and link to the original discussion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Jatin1219. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 14:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pratapgarh Farms & Resorts
Hello, Jatin1219. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pratapgarh Farms & Resorts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)