User talk:Jattaaama

Warning
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Sarsa. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Sarsa, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Battle of Chamkaur has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar). bonadea contributions talk 12:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Shiromani Akali Dal, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 02:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bhagat Singh have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bhagat Singh was changed by Jattaaama (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875981 on 2022-03-22T09:46:08+00:00

April 2022
Your edit to List of chief ministers of Punjab (India) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Venkat TL (talk) 11:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Ludhiana, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 02:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ludhiana, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 03:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shiromani Akali Dal. Bayonet-lightbulb (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 08:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chamkaur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - - Arjayay (talk) 08:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Second Battle of Anandpur (1704), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Please read and follow the instructions at Template:Infobox military conflict in particular the "result parameter" which includes -" this parameter may use one of two standard terms: "X victory" or "Inconclusive"." and " Do not introduce non-standard terms like "decisive", "marginal" or "tactical", or contradictory statements" - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 08:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Battle of Chamkaur shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 03:10, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chamkaur, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)  You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Sarsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saras. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)