User talk:Jauerback/Archives/2011

Proposed deletion of Diane Zak


The article Diane Zak has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable author, lack of independent third party coverage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jonathanwallace (talk) 00:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Drew Peterson
Hey, you're doing some good stuff on this article, but just a few things to keep in mind. First of all, try to only use reliable sources for this article. The website,. doesn't really count as one, however it seems to get it's information from reliable sources -- which is included on the website. Go to those linked articles and get the same info. Finally, please try to start citing the sources correctly. At the very least, throw the links in between two. Even better, if you could follow one of the formats shown in WP:CITET, that would make things look a LOT better. Thanks. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:38, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the delayed reply. Your post got buried on my Talk Page.  Thanks for the suggestions.  I have been "away" from that Drew Peterson page for quite some time now.  His story seems to be flying under the radar, for quite some time now.  In the meanwhile, however, I have actually learned how to do proper citations within Wikipedia articles, as you suggested.  Thanks again.   (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC))

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 16:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC).

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 13:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC).