User talk:Jaume14

Hi. I don't know if this is possible, but could you contact the creator of Desperate HouseWives and please try to get the show to continue. It is amazing and I've re-watched every season 10 times on Hulu. Please try — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.170.32.79 (talk) 12:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Jaume14, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

November 2014
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 19:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Your recent editing history at Regular Show shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 19:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

August 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Inside Out (2015 film). Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''Diff: Unexplained removal of sourced content in favor of unsourced subjective content. Addition of unsourced (and ridiculous) subjective, POV statement "[the film] received universal acclaim from critics". "Universal" is hyperbole.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Dove Cameron at Descendants premiere.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dove Cameron at Descendants premiere.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dove Cameron at Descendants premiere.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dove Cameron at Descendants premiere.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

K.C. Undercover
Your edit is likely to be correct based on the production codes, but it's best to wait for a reliable source to confirm it, per Talk:K.C. Undercover. – nyuszika7h (talk) 16:12, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Best Friends Whenever, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Episodes which have not aired, like this one you added, must be accompanied by a reliable source to verify that it is scheduled to air. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Toy Story 2. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diff: "Universally acclaimed" is subjective hyperbolic fluff. We don't call films "rotten" simply because that's the terminology Rotten Tomatoes might use for bad films, similarly, we do not use "universally acclaimed" just because that's the descriptor Metacritic uses.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your addition to Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 14:10, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of erotic films of the 2010s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Foley ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_erotic_films_of_the_2010s check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_erotic_films_of_the_2010s?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Death Note episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madhouse ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Death_Note_episodes check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Death_Note_episodes?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)