User talk:Jaunty mellifluous

A tag has been placed on Ytkpro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pablo  Talk  |  Contributions  06:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I understand, you may delete. No Problem.

December 2007
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. -- lucasbfr talk 14:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Saalik majzoob"
A page you created, Saalik majzoob, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  So Why  21:07, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Quran, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Muhammad (SAS) is dead as other human being dies. It is a part of the fundamental belief one Muslim shall adhere to. Thinking, he has just departed physically but in exile (in any form other than general dead human) is direct shirk.'' misconception. »  nafSadh did say 14:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Jaunty mellifluous (talk) 07:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Do you even know the definition of Shirk?
 * I'm very afraid of slightest chance of Shirk. sorry for that But this topic is out of the scope of Wikipedia, drop it. Withdrawing my that part of comment. »  nafSadh did say 09:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Jaunty mellifluous (talk) 11:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC) It's cool. I don't mind. Have a good day.
 * Just one thing, you need to sign after your post not before! You can visit WP:TALK. »  nafSadh did say 12:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

wtf?