User talk:Java7837/Archive Apr 2007

License tagging for Image:Alfif.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:Alfif.GIF. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 04:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Category:Converts to Shi'a Islam
Hi, I saw you delete the CfD tag at Category:Converts to Shi'a Islam and reverted it. Then I noticed that it was you who put it there in the first place. Are you nominating this category for deletion? --Selket Talk 23:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Your new articles (not a complaint)
Hi! It looks like you're creating a bunch of new articles with text from the Jewish Encyclopedia. That's a good idea, but there's one thing that you should also do when you're taking stuff from that public domain source -- the template should be added to the article to give proper attribution -- take a look at Nicolas Antoine, I added a References section and the template -- if you add any new articles, stick it on there. Thanks! -- ArglebargleIV 04:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Jim Croce
Interesting re his converting; I never knew that before. Would you mind providing a source (per WP:ATT)? best regards, Jim Butler(talk) 07:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * thank you! - Jim Butler(talk) 07:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Sumita Devi
Regarding this categorization, Sumita Devi is NOT an Indian. Thank you. --Ragib 17:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians by religion
I see that you reassigned such categories as Category:Christian Wikipedians and Category:Buddhist Wikipedians from Category:Wikipedians by religion to Category:Abrahamic Theist Wikipedians and Category:Dharmic Theist Wikipedians. The problem with this, as I see it, is that when I looked at Category:Wikipedians by religion, I was puzzled by the lack of categories for any of the major religions; I couldn't find Jewish Wikipedians, Muslim Wikipedians, Hindu Wikipedians, or any of the other reassigned categories at first. I think that classifying major religions into categories as "Abrahamic Theist" or "Dharmic Theist" tends to increase confusion without supplying significantly more information, and so I'd prefer if the categorization could be changed back. I'm writing this notice to you first in case there is some consensus in favor of using Category:Abrahamic Theist Wikipedians and Category:Dharmic Theist Wikipedians that I'm unaware of. --Metropolitan90 04:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

572 (number)
I have added a "" template to the article 572 (number), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Muchness 03:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Walt Disney
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. There is no proof that Walt Disney was anti-Semitic, and therefore it is not encyclopedic. --Lyght 21:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

WTF?!?!
you arnt the inventor if the internet......but thanks tho..... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jnc8651 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC).

re:WTF
why the hell did u add userboxes to my page??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jnc8651 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC).

Copyright issue with Old Elamite}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk: and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 22:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Benjamin Franklin's Phonetic Alphabet}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk: and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 22:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Interbet}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk: and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 22:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with 21E™}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk: and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk: with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 22:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Motto of the day
Hi, recently you created Motto of the day/April 1, 2007 with the text, Why watch tv?, when you can use wikipedia, but Motto of the day policy requires you to first nominate a motto before it can be displayed on the daily templates. I nominated yours for you, for which you can vote and leave comments here. Feel free to comment on the other mottos as well. -- Tewy  04:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Story of the Day
A page which you have created or significantly contributed to has been nominated for deletion at WP:MFD. See the nomination here. Cheers, PTO 02:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Userbox Noahide
The line "Do not Blasphemy" should be either "Do not blaspheme" or "Do not commit blasphemy". DGG 22:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)