User talk:Java7837/Archive Jun 2007

"Jesus Christ" to "Jesus of Nazareth"
You seem to be changing a lot of instances of Jesus Christ to Jesus of Nazareth with the comment "removing pov". In many cases I agree that the encyclopedically neutral thing is to refer to Jesus with a term that does not imply a claim about whether he was Christ or not. However, there are several places where I think you're a bit too quick. In particular, in sentences that explicitly describe a religious dogma held by certain, it is not inherently POV to use the same phrasing as those who subscribe to the dogma would. For example, a reference to "the second coming of Jesus Christ" becomes nonsense when rewritten to "the second coming of Jesus of Nazareth". The idea of expecting a second coming at all depends on the idea of Jesus holding the office (so-to-say) of Christ, so it is not an accurate rendering of the dogma to describe it as a second coming of Jesus-whether-or-not-he-was-or-is-Christ. I'm not asking you to stop changing "Christ" to "of Nazareth" in sentences that make sense irrespective of the metaphysical status of Jesus, but I don't think this change is appropriate in sentences whose subject is not so much the historical Jesus as the religious concept of the resurrected-and-still-somehow-existing-Son-of-God. Especially in cases where the statement is clearly attributed as a description of a religious view rather than an encyclopedic truth in its own right. âHenning Makholm 22:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Message posted on Friday, May 18, 2007
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Whpq 02:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi. I got your note.  I didn't hit the front page of the website, and relied on the footer of the page which has a copyright notice.  Please accept my apologies for mistakenly tagging the article as a copyvio.  Regards. -- Whpq 16:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Fairy chess piece article copyrights
I have tagged several fairy chess piece articles you created as possible copyright infringements. They are listed at Copyright_problems. Please study carefully what the message (visible, for example, at the camel article) says and take an appropriate action if you so choose. Otherwise the articles will be deleted. --ZeroOne ( talk | @ ) 23:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Biblical characters in rabbinic literature
Hi Java7837: Congratulations on your herculian work with Judaism-related articles! I have just spent a lot of time WP:WIKIFYing all the articles (11 of them as of this message) in Category:Biblical characters in rabbinic literature. You did an excellent job of extracting material from the Jewish Encyclopedia but I had to neaten up a lot of stuff, including the category, which is now a sub-category of Category:Rabbinic literature. Please take a look at what I have done and the WP:STYLE I have tried to add to them. Feel free to contact me. IZAK 06:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Untitled1cvt.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Untitled1cvt.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 15:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Untitledfgfg.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Untitledfgfg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 15:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

thinkbabynames.com

I tagged your template for deletion, for obvious reasons. &mdash; Gaff ÏÎ±Î»Îº 06:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Judiasm Image
Hey, I saw your new image on the Judaism file. In my opinion the ad is not clear and may contain a fair use/non-free image. For copyright safety reasons, I will make a new one. Real96 10:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Ezra
Dont threaten me. I removed one incredibly pov-sentence asserting that the Qur'an is wrong. Your decision to re-add that sentence speaks volumes. Perspicacite 00:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You converted from Islam to Judaism..? 00:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you then... Juhurim? Or would it be.. Khazar? Perspicacite 01:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Revert-only sandbox/77777
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Revert-only sandbox/77777, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia:Revert-only sandbox/77777 is a test page. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia:Revert-only sandbox/77777, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Wikipedia:Revert-only sandbox/77777 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Userbox "planejumping"
I don't see the reason for creating a copy of the skydiving userbox? If you have some code to improve the existing one, I suggest you edit the User:UBX/Skydiving template. Thanks. Superdix 08:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)