User talk:JavautilRandom

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Mark R. Showalter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Tim1965 (talk) 23:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

DYK for Mark R. Showalter
Orlady (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, JavautilRandom. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Jamesx12345 14:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

You've done some truly top class work here. In have nigh on 10,000 edits and haven't had a DYK. Great Job. Jamesx12345 14:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Romulus
I remember early polling having both Romulus and Vulcan, and they were the two clear leads, but I can't find the site now. Maybe it was updated once Romulus was pulled? — kwami (talk) 01:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The Feb 12 blog at plutorocks.com seems to indicate that Romulus was rejected from the very beginning because it is already the name of an asteroid's moon. There is no indication of a vote count for Romulus at http://plutorocks.com.   Other contemporaneous sites such as this space.com article seem to concur that Romulus never make it onto the ballot.  JavautilRandom (talk) 06:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

RE: Moon vs. Natural Satellite
Yeah, I'm aware that a lot of articles use "moon" to refer to other satellites. But.... hmm, I guess I'm just personally uneasy about it. It's a minor pet peeve. But I guess if it's just fine as is, I am sorry for starting an argument over it 134340Goat (talk) 01:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)