User talk:Javelez2

Javelez2, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Peer Review Your article has a lot of technical terms in the lead so it may be more effective to use more layperson speak. It may also be helpful to add a diagram where it explains the structure of the microspore under morphology. One thing I really like about it so far is the amount of references to other Wiki pages and the attention to detail. Brburke (talk) 02:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review August Beers I really like you citation for the Microspore Embrogenisis section, it has been cited many times according to google scholar and definitely counts as a good source as far as wikipedia is concerned. That being said your description of the contents of the paper is a little heard to read. I would start of by changing "This process is the most effective way of yielding" to "Microspore Embrogenisis is a common process utilized by spores an effective way of yielding" just to be a little more clear. The remaining two sentences in the section suffer from the problem Brburke identified that they do not provide enough info to a non technical writer. After finishing the section, I am left wondering why it is important to the Micro-spore topic. Perhaps you need a conclusion sentence which summarizes why Embrogenisis is important to microspores. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdbeersBB2030 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)