User talk:Javierantequeraq

Your GA nomination of Lorazepam
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lorazepam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Javierantequeraq -- Javierantequeraq (talk) 09:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Javierantequeraq, you are never supposed to review a GA nomination that you've made yourself. In this case, in your enthusiasm, you've also run afoul of another rule at the Good Article nomination instructions, which is that if you haven't made a significant contribution to an article, you should not nominate it to be a GA without first consulting with the regular editors of the article, who are most likely to know whether it is ready for a GA nomination. (For example, by posting a request on the article's talk page.)
 * In this case, it is clear that the article is not ready: the Contraindications section has been tagged, with cause, for inadequate sourcing, and a number of other subsections have similar sourcing gaps. Verifiability is a crucial component of Wikipedia articles in general, and is a clear requirement for GAs.
 * I have removed your nomination for these reasons. Please do not make further GA nominations until you have a better understanding of the process. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lorazepam
The article Lorazepam you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lorazepam for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Javierantequeraq -- Javierantequeraq (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)