User talk:Jawartak

Speedy deletion of Josiah wartak
A tag has been placed on Josiah wartak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 14:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fairbooks.com


A tag has been placed on Fairbooks.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 03:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fairbooks.com


A tag has been placed on Fairbooks.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 04:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Fairbooks.com, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 04:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Fairbooks.com. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Fairbooks.com
I have moved this article to your userspace so that you can work on it. It's located at User:Jawartak/Fairbooks.com. ... disco spinster   talk  04:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that it is still likely to be deleted as spam unless it is improved soon. The move should give you time to work on it, but it would be a mistake to think of this as a long-term way of avoiding deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jawartak/Fairbooks.com
User:Jawartak/Fairbooks.com, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jawartak/Fairbooks.com and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Jawartak/Fairbooks.com during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC)