User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 1

Hilary Duff
Just letting you know that I reverted your edit to Hilary. That page is a dab page, and the list of people on it are known simply as "Hilary". Hillary Clinton and Edmund Hillary are frequently called simply "Hillary" in common use; that's why they're on there. Hilary Duff is already on the page Hillary. I guess it would be nice to distinguish those pages by more than just the different spelling, huh? --Auntof6 (talk) 03:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * In addition, there's a note at Hilary that says not to make this kind of addition. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rok ict
A tag has been placed on Rok ict requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Netalarm 00:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Incite (Band)
A tag has been placed on Incite (Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 05:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Slaughter


The article The Slaughter has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable music album.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schfifty 3  05:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Penix
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ridernyc (talk) 06:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] located above the edit window.  This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when.   –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 19:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Big Johnson
A tag has been placed on Big Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; RHaworth 04:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of New skids on the jock
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of NSOTJ
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 06:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Inside Indiana Business with Gerry Dick
I have nominated Inside Indiana Business with Gerry Dick, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Inside Indiana Business with Gerry Dick. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 06:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grow Indiana Media Ventures


The article Grow Indiana Media Ventures has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has had notability and other tags for over a year (in some cases nearing three years). My searching to find something to improve the article with, in light of today's copy and paste spam attack on the page, turned up nothing to verify notability.  Mostly I found links to the official site of the company in question.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Millahnna (mouse) talk  16:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Triumph group, inc
A tag has been placed on Triumph group, inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 04:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Triumph Group‎


The article Triumph Group‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justin W Smith talk/stalk 06:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Hypergraph. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Re: this edit. Justin W Smith talk/stalk 06:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC) Sorry, advertising was not my intention. My intention was a redirect.Jax 0677 (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Your article is awesome!
Hey Jax! I want to thank you for your contributions. Your article is very good. I just want to tell you, click here on how to cite references. I hope that helps, and keep up the good work! :D By the way, if you ever need any help, come to my talk page, and shoot me a message! Endofskull (talk) 02:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TGI (disambiguation)


The article TGI (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * a disambiguation page linking to one article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 03:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Your addition to Triumph Group has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''Your contributions were virtually copy/paste from the Gale company history. This is clear copyright violation and is not allowed. '' Biker Biker (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Penix


The article Penix has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * As there is only one Wikipedia article with 'Penix' in its title listed here, this is not really a disambiguation page, but seems rather to exist solely to list several people who do not have an article in Wikipedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald Albury 13:13, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sean Penix


A tag has been placed on Sean Penix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Travelbird (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CDI Corporation


A tag has been placed on CDI Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  04:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Salary.com


A tag has been placed on Salary.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zachlipton (talk) 08:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Advice
Your article is more likely to survive at AfD if you meet the notability requirement, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. See WP:42 and WP:Notability (organizations and companies). The test is, have other people, independent of the company, thought it important and significant enough to write about?

In fact, if you show notability there is no reason why the article should go to AfD. The list of warnings on this talk page tell me that you have been having some trouble getting to grips with Wikipedia, which does indeed have a rather steep learning curve. WP:Your first article is a good guide worth studying, and so is the WP:FAQ/Organizations.

After adding sources, I suggest you ask for comments at WP:Requests for feedback before moving the article back into the main encyclopedia. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Indian reservation, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -Uyvsdi (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi

Penix (surname)
Please stop adding to disambiguation pages the names of people who do not have articles in Wikipedia. Disambiguation pages are intended to aid navigation to articles, not to list people who do not meet the notability criteria of Notability (people). Please read Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) before making any more changes to disambiguation pages. -- Donald Albury 20:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ZOMM LLC Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ZOMM LLC Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed gun law article merger
Greetings, Jax 0677. I've started a discussion about your proposal to merge of the two gun law articles. Feel free to join in, at Talk:Gun law in the United States. — Mudwater (Talk) 13:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Wiknic
Hi Jax, I'm glad that you are interested in holding a local Wiknic in Phoenix. I will be out of town for that date, but I am interested in seeing a Phoenix meetup get off the ground. As you might have noticed, we haven't been very successful in the past. Are you interested in acting as the main organizer for the event?

I would suggest that the Scottsdale Civic Center mall would be an excellent place. There is shade, grass, and seating, and a nice atmosphere. It's not the most central location, but a lot of local editors seem to be more East Valley folks, especially with ASU nearby. I can try to help find other locals, if you're interested. Dominic·t 23:34, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Dominic, I appreciate your vote of confidence, however, the only thing that I would have time to do is tell people where to show up, and that's it.--Jax 0677 (talk) 19:22, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey, that in itself is a good start, Jax! Maybe update Meetup/Phoenix or make Meetup/Phoenix 2 with that.--Pharos (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey people, I am thinking that Margaret T. Hance Park may be a good venue for this event, since it is centrally located. Thoughts anyone?--Jax 0677 (talk) 17:21, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Looks good to me, although I am only a New Yorker, rather than an, um... Phoenician.--Pharos (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm not familiar with that park, but it could be great. You'll probably want to make sure there is ample shade, considering the climate, and probably seating. Considering that there is not much of a local community organized yet, it's probably better not to wait around worrying about the venue (which is what we did last time we tried something). If you are satisfied with the park, just be bold and update the meetup page with time and place, and we can set up a geonotice to direct Phoenix Wikipedians there. If there are any strenuous objections, someone will raise them, but it's more likely people just want to be told where to go. :-) Dominic·t 14:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Just WP:BE BOLD and declare the place and time, dude! :)--Pharos (talk) 19:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Against All Will.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Against All Will.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:A Rhyme & Reason Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:A Rhyme & Reason Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Against All Will.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Against All Will.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Against All Will The Drug I Need Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Against All Will The Drug I Need Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Against All Will Swept Away Cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Against All Will Swept Away Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup / Phoenix 2
Jax, I'm looking forward to meeting you on Saturday. I'm also an engineer with automotive experience, and I'm currently in a job search, so I'd like to do some networking with you, if you don't mind. &mdash; Wdfarmer (talk) 00:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dick Millman


A tag has been placed on Dick Millman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Jahahn  ( gab )  05:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Indiana tornado
Just FYI, I deleted this redirect you created. There are dozens of tornadoes in Indiana each year, I don't see why this should redirect to a certain tornado outbreak. - Running On Brains (talk) 01:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Back From Ashes band photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Back From Ashes band photo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, it is a publicity photo but the general policy for music groups has been to allow non-free photos when the band or group is no longer together. According to the article, the band is still performing.  We hope (talk) 16:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Back From Ashes
Caps Please see WP:CAPS. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bfa yvonne-300x200.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bfa yvonne-300x200.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Pete Hawley photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pete Hawley photo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Jason Hobel photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jason Hobel photo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bfa yvonne-300x200.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bfa yvonne-300x200.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cello Dias Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cello Dias Photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Placeholders
First of all, the reason it was done twice is that I'm just working off a big list, so I don't check each article for previous edits and when something re-appears on the list I don't noticed that it has been on the list before.

Second, as for the reason for my edit, I'm updating the Infobox pageant titleholder template to support the image parameter, similar to Infobox person & also numerous other infobox templates. I'm now going through all the links replacing the photo param with an image param version which does the same thing. But for those that were using placeholder image, I was just removing the image rather than converting it as that was easier to do and placeholder image don't add much value anyway. -- WOSlinker (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Sammus Theory


A tag has been placed on The Sammus Theory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Inclusion of non-notable band
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. In general, a person, group or organization included in an article, as on Come Undone (Duran Duran song), should be notable. If you wish to add a mention of such a subject, please confirm that they are notable according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Gun laws in Kansas
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gun laws in Kansas, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://fbinicsystem.com/us-gun-laws-by-state/kansas-background-check-and-gun-laws.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Gun laws in Maine
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gun laws in Maine, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://fbinicsystem.com/us-gun-laws-by-state/maine-background-check-and-gun-laws.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Guns N&
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Guns N&, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Guns N' Roses discography. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

VA shooting comments
Thanks for your support of the idea that Neutralhomer and I have proposed. Would you be able to go back and add your date stamp to your comments, so that they can be properly attributed to you? Thanks. HuskyHuskie (talk) 23:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Jackyl
I moved the image of Chris you added over to the right side with the other band members. Seemed better to group together that way, and the chainsaw image applied more to the section of the article it draws next to. Also, the particular length of the images was messing with the section formatting in some display sizes. (If there's a manual of style for arranging images in a short article, I didn't look for it. :)  )  Rearrange them however, but I saved it since it worked a lot better in the preview for me. Desirsar (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Gun laws in North Carolina
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gun laws in North Carolina, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://fbinicsystem.com/us-gun-laws-by-state/north-carolina-background-check-and-gun-laws.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Gun laws in North Dakota
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gun laws in North Dakota, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://fbinicsystem.com/us-gun-laws-by-state/north-dakota-background-check-and-gun-laws.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Gun Law copyright
I notice you tagging the copyright violation. I think this may be a case of the site copying wikipedia. It looks like almost every state page is duplicated in the same way, and I really doubt a single editor (or collective) went out and copied state by state from that site. Much more likely they took a dump of wikipedia and are just using the site as a google ad profit center Gaijin42 (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Gun laws in Oregon
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gun laws in Oregon, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://fbinicsystem.com/us-gun-laws-by-state/oregon-background-check-and-gun-laws.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)