User talk:Jaxz28

Speedy deletion of Darwin kummins
A tag has been placed on Darwin kummins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Dethme0w 08:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not create hoaxes. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. ~Matticus TC 08:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Darwin kummins
Darwin kummins, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Darwin kummins satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Darwin kummins and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Darwin kummins during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~Matticus TC 09:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from Talk:Darwin kummins
The page on Darwin kummins should not be deleted. It does not involve any of my freinds or family, nor does it violate copyrite laws. Its no different than an article about Freddy Kruger or Jason Vohrees.

jaxz28Jaxz28 08:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * And this Darwin Kummins is as fictional as Freddy Kruger and Jason Vorhees. The difference is that Kruger and Vorhees are the antagonists of major horror film series, and not something made up one day. Wikipedia is not here to publish your creative writing. ~Matticus TC 08:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

While that is true it dosen't mean that it shouldn't have a chance to be on here. And by-the-by it wasn't something made up one day it is a in-process of a creation of Darwin Kummins. Please reconsider deleting since i have made it clear that it is NOT real and shouldn't be taken for a real person.

jaxz28Jaxz28 09:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * That's exactly why it shouldn't be on here. Please read the policy document Wikipedia is not for things made up one day - it explains quite clearly why things you make up, or are in the process of creating, are not viable topics for an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~Matticus TC 09:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

well then how can it stay on. according to that article it states readers cannot verify the reliability or if person even exists. but since Darwin is not real than i cannot exactly show proof. so tell me how it can stay on, cause the article you suggested wasn't any help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaxz28 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * That policy document explains why your article cannot stay, not how you can improve the article so it can. Just because a character is fictional doesn't mean it can't have an article on Wikipedia. What is important is that that character must have been written about by in reliable third-party sources. Information about film characters, for example, can be verified from reviews written by critics and in movie information books, published interviews with the creator, etc. That is how information about fictional characters is verifiable. ~Matticus TC 09:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Impulse 004.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Impulse 004.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ~Matticus TC 09:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)