User talk:JayBollin

November 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sons of Confederate Veterans. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rsk6400 (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sons of Confederate Veterans, you may be blocked from editing. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) My Talk Page 19:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I have to disagree here! The current Wiki entry about the Sons of Confederate Veterans is incorrect!  The sons of confederate veterans are definitely not for white supremacy!  And needs to be changed because it's not true!  I am a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans myself and we have tried to update an accurate description of our work here!  Therefore, it is incomprehensible to me that our correction would be deleted without checking!  I patent to Wikipedia to check the correction of the sons of confederate veterans article and update it with our article!  Greetings Jürgen Bollin sons of confederate veterans JayBollin (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are a member, you have a conflict of interest, see WP:COI. Wikipedia is built on reliable sources, see WP:RS. Finally, your changes on that page showed extremely poor formatting and poor English. Rsk6400 (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * And your German is also poor, see de:Deppenleerzeichen. Rsk6400 (talk) 21:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * We go by what mainstream sources say. Most white supremacists deny they are white suprematists anyway. Doug Weller  talk 22:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm a little scared! How can there be a conflict of interest if I, as a member of the Sons of Conferderate Veterans, point out that the current article is incorrect???  Next, if the text formatting isn't good I could have changed that!  But there was no interest on their part!  Only at this point is a very questionable statement made about my knowledge of German and English!!!???  You should also know that the Google translator does a good job and that the whole thing can only be taken as insulting!  But what's worst is that they seem to place more value on street nonsense that they call mainstream sources. It really shocks me!  If this is Wikipedia's normal approach, how credible can Wikipedia still be!  Thank you for this revelation! JayBollin (talk) 06:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @JayBollin It's as credible as modern mainstream sources. Doug Weller  talk 12:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)