User talk:JayJ47/Archive 3

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:PCD-Beep.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:PCD-Beep.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rihanna-Shut-Up-and-Drive.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Rihanna-Shut-Up-and-Drive.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rihanna-Unfaithful-Video.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Rihanna-Unfaithful-Video.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SayItRight-Video.png
Thank you for uploading File:SayItRight-Video.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 21:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

File:SayItRight-Video.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:SayItRight-Video.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Stifle (talk) 10:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:PCD-Beep.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PCD-Beep.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Rihanna-Shut-Up-and-Drive.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rihanna-Shut-Up-and-Drive.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Stifle (talk) 10:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Rihanna-Unfaithful-Video.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rihanna-Unfaithful-Video.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Stifle (talk) 10:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Lenzi
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robert Lenzi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * minor actor, fails WP:ENTERTAINER

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tassedethe (talk) 12:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:What's-Left-Of-Me-Video.png
Thank you for uploading File:What's-Left-Of-Me-Video.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Robert Lenzi
An article that you have been involved in editing, Robert Lenzi, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tassedethe (talk) 14:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Please update your status with WP:VG
Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or User WPVG somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
 * Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
 * Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
 * —WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot  03:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GTA SA-GROUP3.png
 Thanks for uploading File:GTA SA-GROUP3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Santos-UglyBetty.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Santos-UglyBetty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JordinSparks-No Air.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:JordinSparks-No Air.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away
 WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi
Hi. I am Jivesh. I see that you usually contribute to music related articles and that you also reviewed Usher for GA. Do you like R&B music? If yes, do you like Beyonce? Would you like to join WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles? Jivesh   &bull;  Talk2Me  12:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * You are welcome and thank you as well. Jivesh    &bull;  Talk2Me  15:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anya Stroud.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Anya Stroud.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Labels-or-Love.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Labels-or-Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Please
Please please please participate here. Jivesh   &bull;  Talk2Me  10:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anya Stroud.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Anya Stroud.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Labels-or-Love.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Labels-or-Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Love on Top for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love on Top is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed here until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jivesh   &bull;  Talk2Me  09:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

User:JayJ47/ChartRuns
Done. --Efe (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Please let us know what you think
My friend, as you know, Beyonce's new album 4 is being handled in a catastrophic way (i do not know if this is a correct word). Please voice your opinion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Party_(song)#Article.27s_format. here] so that we can decide which format will suit "Party" that best. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Another discussion, this time regarding "Love on Top"
First of all, my sincere thanks for your participation in previous Beyonce-related discussion. I request you to please weigh your opinion here. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 06:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Discussion
Hi there, please help reach consensus by weighing in your opinion here. Thanks! Oz  talk  10:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Don't Worry Be Happy
I redirected the article "Don't Worry Be Happy (Guy Sebastian song) back to Guy Sebastian discography because it fails WP:NSONGS. It hasn't charted yet and there isn't enough reliable sources to keep it. Oz   talk  00:29, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That's okay. You can add it back once its charted. Oz   talk  01:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

My Sincere Wishes For This Festive Season

 * Thank you. Your message really touched me. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 10:48, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Maria Sharapova career statistics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Russian and Wimbledon


 * Novak Djokovic career statistics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Wimbledon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

You may be interested in this article that I have created
Hi. I see that you have a lot of interest in tennis pages. I have created this internal article (which has not been made public to Wikipedia as of yet), you may be interested in reading (or editing) them:


 * User:MasterMind5991/Serbian performance at the 2008 Australian Open

Let me know what you think of the article. MasterMind5991 (talk) 12:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Serbian tennis article
I do not intend to make my page official (this has already been covered in part on the real 2008 Australian Open page), and I was inspired by your page User:JayJ47/The Trivalry which contained a lot of useful and true information, so that's why I created it in the first place. Yes, Federer, Nadal and Djokovic have a three-way rivalry between them but it's never possible that these three players could ever play each other in an offically sanctioned tennis match. That page by the way is a great idea to illustrate the great rivalry and reign that they have over men's tennis at the moment.

I am also currently working on an "unofficial" page called User:MasterMind5991/The WTA Spice Girls, a name I have come up with to describe some of the WTA's top tennis players. The nicknames I have given to the nicknames will be interesting! But of course, I will continue to work on these "imaginary" pages and not make them official.

MasterMind5991 (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Martín del Potro career statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2009 US Open (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Women's Trivalry
Did you know that there is another women's trivalry in tennis - it involves Victoria Azarenka, Maria Sharapova and Serena Williams. I have included a brief summary of their "trivalry" in your page "The Trivalry" which involves Djokovic, Nadal and Federer.

MasterMind5991 (talk) 03:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

 * You are welcome. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Grigor Dimitrov --- 2013 --- scores
I am putting the scores back. If you remove them again, I will put them back in! Thanks! Naki (talk) 12:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Super Bowl XLVII halftime show
Hurricane Beyonce caused a power failure! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Please participate ...
... here. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 04:08, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Major/Important finals, or actually nothing
The long standing term at Novak Djokovic career statistics was simply a "Finals" heading until someone slipped in "Major Finals" somewhere recently. I see you changed it back today but that is a poor choice because the term Major in tennis is only for one of the four Majors, else confusion reigns. I had added "Important" but after your change, I went back to the long standing version of simply "Finals." After thinking about it I changed it further still to eliminate the term completely and give each their own heading. If you can think of something better I'm all ears... but "Major" can't be a heading for year-end championships or olympics or masters 1000's. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * "Significant finals" actually sounds better to me than my own "Important finals." But what about my last change? Do we really need that heading? It seems like we could dispense with it entirely. What do you think? Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Go for it then...we can always post it at the tennis project and get some other views, but it seems a minor issue. As long as we don't confuse with Major I'm good with it, and unless some consensus changes I'll try to correct other pages as "significant" whenever I come across the same situation. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:25, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:GTA SA-GROUP3.png)
Thanks for uploading File:GTA SA-GROUP3.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Tennis tournament name addition
I have no idea how that was missed. Good addition. If anything it's the place name that is more irrelevant than the tournament name. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree to keep both. I was just saying if one were to be considered more unneeded (like if space is at a premium) it would have been the location, not the tournament. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

One Direction
They are not a boy band. 79.97.153.17 (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of So Fresh: The No. 1 Hits for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article So Fresh: The No. 1 Hits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So Fresh: The No. 1 Hits until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 08:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Producers
On songs, there are two types producers: producers of the music and producers of the vocals. Up until about 5 years ago, music producers were the most prominent of these types. However, with the changing nature of the industry people often call on music producers to produce songs which are then sent to other studios around the world to wherever the recording artist is based. There the recording artist with a vocal producer and recording engineer will record their vocals. If someone is thus credited as a vocal producer, this is equal weight to someone else who is being credited as a record producer. Please do not go around removing vocal producers from infoboxes. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  12:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Reverted edits
Hi, I see that you reverted my edits at Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal career statistics pages. I read the guideline and, with a tip from wikipedia project, i made the changes. They are totally wright. So could you adapt it as i had done?

Rivalries discussion
See, Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis.HotHat (talk) 04:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Classic (song)
Hello JayJ47,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Classic (song) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TRL (talk) 03:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Federer stats
I agree that Federers stats page should be back to normal until the project determines what is best, but in case you missed it we are in discussion at the Tennis project talk page about tweaking some of the tables. Your input would be appreciated. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

WP:TENNIS
See the ongoing discussion at WP:TENNIS before you revert again. --TIAYN (talk) 07:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)