User talk:JayMaslar

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Florida breweries


A tag has been placed on List of Florida breweries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of List of Florida breweries and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix talk  06:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

List of New York breweries
Please see WP:CORP. Corvus cornix talk  06:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I am adding all breweries from all states in the list of US Breweries. Please don't, until you write the articles about the breweries. Wikipedia frowns on articles of redlinks. You would need to provide evidence that the breweries are notable and it isn't just spam. Corvus cornix talk  06:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Florida breweries for deletion
The article List of Florida breweries is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Florida breweries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Corvus cornix talk  18:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2023
An article you recently created, Make Noise, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, first place  atop the article, publish, then click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Silikonz 💬 00:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Make Noise
Hello, JayMaslar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Make Noise, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)