User talk:JayTSolivert

March 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Contact sport—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I understand. Is there a way to make an unpublished draft and send it to a mentor for review, to ensure it is within wikipedia guidelines.?
 * Also, "did appear constructive", to me, sounds like it was meant to cripple the spirit of wikipedia, or did it not expand further into the topic? I udnerstand intent and action can be different. Am I right in this, and would you be willing to clarify.
 * Thank you for the quick reply. JayTSolivert (talk) 05:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, Jay. In your edit, you deleted the entire page and replaced it with only 2 paragraphs. While this may have been an accident, I'm unsure if that's the case. Wikipedia is intended to go in-depth into topics, and I see no problem with the article in its current state. Also, your definition doesn't appear to be correct? Contact sports include most martial arts.
 * Scrapping entire articles should only be done for exceptionally bad articles containing many errors. Ideally, Wikipedia articles should have all general information about a subject in a concise manner. For such a wide category as "contact sports", it is necessary to elaborate on different types and further elaboration on specific rules. LeftyTightyRightyLoosy (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)