User talk:Jay Ambo

Welcome!

Hello, Jay Ambo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Remuant, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hairhorn (talk) 03:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Remuant


The article Remuant has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wiki is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 03:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Jay Ambo (talk) 00:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

"Wiki is not a dictionary" If wiki is not "a dictionary" then why have pages on such topics as "Love" and so forth? I feel this statement is harsh. I merely added a definition to a word. Why not improve it instead of criticising it? Jay Ambo (talk) 00:33, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The article for love is far more wide-reaching than just simply defining the word as you have done with the above article. If an article's only purpose is to define a word, it it more suited for Wiktionary and not Wikipedia as the latter is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. I hope that helps! Topher385 (talk) 02:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)