User talk:Jayakrishnan.ks100/Archive 12

disruptive IP editors
you have taken the right actions in restoring the correct values from the sources and giving notice to the IPs on their talk page about their inappropriate actions. You may want to be more careful about using the generic vandalism warnings - a whole listing of warnings are found here Template messages/User talk namespace

the template below talks about inserting factual errors and would probably be most appropriate, increasing the number with each time they repeat the act.
 * {subst:uw-error1} / {subst:uw-error2} / {subst:uw-error3} / {subst:uw-error4}

When they have been given and ignored the "final warning", then they can be reported at the vandal notice board AIV and an administrator will take action.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  07:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi,, Jayakrishnan.ks100! The things mentioned above by User:TheRedPenOfDoom are spot-on. First try warning if the User/Ip is Vandalising, if still continues u may report at Administrator intervention against vandalism page (mostly after final warning unless it is a blatant Vandalism). Happy editing! reagrds, DRAGON BOOSTER   ★  14:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC).

On Malayalam cinema edit war
There seems to be an edit war going on Malayalam cinema page. Which started with | this edit made by 69.47.228.36. From what I understand, 69.47.228.36 edited an info existed in the Malayalam cinema page and South Indian film industry page for long time. It carried citations to newspapers links justifying it. 69.47.228.36 edited the information and citations too. He then proceeded to edit South Indian film industry also to suit his plans, all these without not a single independent report justifying claim. The edit war has to stop. Please restore the version existed before edit war started, until consensus is reached. ChroniclerSanjay (talk) 10:27, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Requesting you to put your thoughts here: Talk:Malayalam_cinema.
 * Btw, very surprised to see a new user getting alligned so quickly with the wiki policies. I guess you were here for fairly sometime before migrating to this user name; were'nt you? Cheers, -- Aarem (Talk) 08:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide
It should be more or less cleaned up now. There are two outstanding films that need to be sourced (one has some information on the talk page that simple addition should be able to make if one is familiar with converting to US dollars) and then the list put into proper order.

I also left a question on the talk page about what income streams BOI uses to determine Gross that may be added into the lead if appropriate.

If there is information about various box office milestones, (first film to reach X, first film to break X in only overseas collection, etc.) those might be interesting to include as well. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  18:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Mr. Kunjacko Boban has acted in 50 films in malayalam cinema as lead and supporting actor and is cosidered as one of the leading actors of malayalam cinema. his latest realse romans has been widely acclaimed for his performance. thank u. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightocean (talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * You can't just vaguely say "considered". Considered by whom? You should provide the citation for that. Otherwise, it would fall under peacock terms. Same with term 'widely acclaimed'. Wikipedia follows the encyclopedic writing style. So you should rely of factual and provable statements about the subject. JK (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Mammootty
Mr. Mammootty has acted in more than 360 films,in malayalam cinema as lead actor and is cosidered as one of the leading method actors of malayalam cinema. this is long standing sourced material you can check it. thanks. (talk) User:Flowers of the world (talk) d 01:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC) (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Flowers_of_the_world

potential socks
there were several articles where materialthunder and nightocean were edit warring against each other, so if they are the same individual, they either have a split personality or are much more sophisticated in their Wiki-manipulations than they appear. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  07:56, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

case now opened
Another user has indicated a belief that the user is socking through a different account and an investigation has been opened at Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world. If you wish to include your views about the other account, please go to the page at add your evidence and WP:DIFFS. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  17:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Peruva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! — rybec 05:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your recent editing history at Kunchacko Boban shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. You may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mollywood1 (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2013‎ (UTC)

March 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kunchacko Boban. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Why are you making unnecessary changes to Good Article. ---London at night  talk to me  07:52, 30 March 2013‎  (UTC)
 * Stop misusing warning templates. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a fanpage. JK (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Who tells it is a fan page. This is not misusing. Merenjith gave me a report that you removing the source from article Kunchacko Boban and you promoting dileep here «»«»  ---London at night  talk to me 08:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)


 * There seems to be good understanding between both of you and that IP. I will take this upto sockpuppet investigation. JK (talk) 08:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

What do mean? what sockpuppet? don't be in a fight with me. thanks ---London at night  talk to me   15:32, 30 March 2013‎ (UTC)

I told you that don't be in a fight with me why are you putting my name on Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world here what nonsence is this? what proof did you provide. the proof that you provide is not a solid one. ---London at night  talk to me  04:24, 31 March 2013

Salim Kumar
I got that childhood info in an interview from Labour India. What reference link is there for it?

I know that you're a Malayalee (judging from your visit to Salim Kumar's Wikipedia page). If so, can you edit and add more info to the two pages I have made?

Those pages are Thatteem Mutteem and Bhima Jewels Comedy Festival. I have improved the article. Still, you can edit it. Please do so. I'll be happy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sureshkumarmalayil (talk • contribs) 13:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

user Warning
I told you that don't be in a fight who using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipediawith and why are you putting my name on Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world here what nonsence is this? what proof did you provide. the proof that you provide is not a solid one Wikipedia is not for fight . ---London at night  talk to me 15:18, 2 April 2013‎  (UTC)


 * I know you merely copied the word 'fight' from diff and using it indiscreetly. You should atleast read what edit warring means before sending such messages. JK (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Do you know what is the meaning of warring and you are saying that i merely copied the word 'fight'. You are again telling nonsense. I think you want to fight with me. Wikipedia is not for fight. you can reply on my talk page ---London at night  talk to me 15:19, 2 April 2013‎  (UTC)


 * I'm just giving you a polite advice to click that link titled 'fight'. Its the fourth time you are using that word in my talkpage without knowing the meaning. Now I would have to tell you to stop avoid posting on my talkpage on the issue. JK (talk) 15:38, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

sock puppet investigation opened
I have opened a new chapter in the sock puppet investigation Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world on your behalf. Please provide the more specific evidence. Thanks! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

adding names

 * It looks like there is a pretty big line of investigations underway Sockpuppet investigations, so it may take a while to get to Flowers of the world, particularly when many of them are already blocked.
 * The only thing I would suggest differently is that when you add new names, after evidence has started to be presented, to put a note (added on DATE) so that people can tell why certain evidence is only discussing certain accounts and if the investigators have already begun they can see that they have more things to look into. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  22:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

What's up at Kunchacko Boban?
I don't see clear vandalism, so it looks like you're involved in a content dispute at Kunchacko Boban. There is no exception to the bright-line three revert rule in the case of content disputes, so you'll need to present your case at Talk:Kunchacko Boban and work toward consensus for how the article should appear. —C.Fred (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

assertion of notability without any proof
Hello, with this edit you asserted "notabilty" for the film, however you have not yet produced any sourcing to support such a claim. Please do so or I intend to nominate it for deletion. Your actions now in actually supporting your claim of notability will save everyone trouble later. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Without sources, the mere assertion of notability is insufficient. You can join the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Purappadu-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  18:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. MaskedHero (talk) 07:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
MaskedHero (talk) 07:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, Jayakrishnan. I see you undid my edit here, with the reason "no source". Makes no sense to me. It was me who removed an unsourced claim and you who readded the same unsourced claim. Hope this was just a onetime careless mistake by you :)Wilhelm Chandrahaasan (talk) 09:52, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Mr.Jay Bangalore is in Karnataka State for ur kind info. By Quoting Bangalore as Mysore State it is communicating wrong information to users. As Mysore state doesnt exits as of now. Hope it answers ur query. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gogdygody (talk • contribs) 12:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Oops. That was a mistake. Sorry for that. JK (talk) 09:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hai i think the information was correct on mammootty. If you believe the information was wrong you can add. thanks. Merenjith (talk). 07:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The section is "Request for a DUCK block of User:Jayakrishnan.ks101". De728631 (talk) 14:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I know what you mean about being taken for a ride. Its happened to me, in the last week, accusation at ANI or another venue can be disturbing especially if it is taken at face-value. Still pretty lame socking attempts and masking, but bet you breathed a sigh of relief when it was taken care of, huh? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey yes. Blocking me would have been terrible. I was kinda surprised to see that message from TRPOD considering his experience and knowledge of Wikipedia policies. JK (talk) 16:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was spoofed by the names. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  17:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Someone is spoofing your account again. I have made a notice on ANI. Administrators'_noticeboard. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:24, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The guy has apparently created another whole sock drawer of impostors, so I opened a checkuser. If you have anything to add, its: Sockpuppet investigations/Gogdygody -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  16:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Kamal Hassan
Hai dude i am not sock we can only use reliably published sources, not any old thing we find on google. Claims about living people require the highest standard of sourcing.. And we should only be using secondary sources. The guidance is pretty clear that " Kamal Hassan is a Chameleon is not the meaning of method actor and "Going down the Bollywood chute...with David Chute'' should not be used. weather it is sock or not" try to correct. —Ajith real7 (talk)10:01, 29 April 2013‎

Hai dude you are saying that going to be blocked for abusing multiple accounts. i am not using multiple accounts. weather i block i think you will not reverting it back because of fake source. Kamal Hassan is a Chameleon is not the meaning of method actor and "Going down the Bollywood chute...with David Chute' is not reliably published source —Ajith real7 (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2013‎ ‎
 * What's that supposed to mean? JK (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

If an actor is Going down the Bollywood. he became method actor? then all the bollywood are meathod actors. remember one thing i am not a malayale. —Ajith real7 (talk) 10:20, 29 April 2013‎ ‎.


 * Are any of u interested in taking part in Kamal Haasan's GA reassessment? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

MAY 2013
Ok i agree with you. there is some mistake in the article of kamal hassan some unsourced content that he is  popularly referred to as Ulaganayagan (English: Universal Hero) can you remove it.Sreeramakrishna14 (talk) 11:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Your recent editing history at No.20 Madras Mail shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Alexf(talk) 11:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "The Hindu#Controversy". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 16:29, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kunchacko Boban filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sneha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piravom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

The Hindu Controversy
Dear JK There were references cited along with the changes made. So please refer to them before deleting the editing. FurtherThe editor of The Hindu, N.Ram was executive member of communist students union (SIFA). And if you read The Hindu, you will come to know about the leaning. Please do not remove editing as I am citing references to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4490:D660:0:0:0:0:B07 (talk) 11:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * "The Sunday Indian" is a promotional website and hence a questionable source. The article by Kuldip Nayyar doesn't mention anything about left-leaning. Even if he has mentioned it, it is just his personal opinion and not a fact. Wikipedia should only contain facts. The only fact that can be inferred from that article is that Kuldeep Nayyar has criticised the editor-in-chief of the newspaper for imposing his agenda and ideology on the organisation.JK (talk) 12:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

"Bloomberg" is an international financial news site. The Sunday Indian is magazine of politics, economics and current affairs and not a promotional website. More references are now cited from other sources. Ideology of a newspaper is of prime importance in order to publish neutral news. Its a well known fact and don't trivialise it by mentioning "some online portals", which are infact websites of established news magazines/agencies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4490:D660:0:0:0:0:B07 (talk) 02:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The Sunday Indian is a promotional website of IIPM. Doesn't count as reliable source. Apart from Bloomberg and the Sunday Indian, you haven't provided a single reliable source establishing The Hindu's left-wing bias. So the statement "by some online portals" is factually correct. JK (talk) 07:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Kamal Haasan GAR
Hi, do you want to take part in the GA reassessment of Kamal Haasan? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=574301867 your edit] to Praveen Togadia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * of the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP). Togadia has been accused of making inflammatory speeches. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/hate-speech-praveen-
 * belonging from minority jain hindu family

Kunchacko Boban
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kunchacko Boban with. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Onam2013xOnam2013 (talk)17:11, 12:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mammootty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dileep (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

User Onam
User:Onam2013 is creating mayhem on Wikipedia, and is refusing to change. I know u gave him a warning, but he reverted the message away. I think we can just block him. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

I know, he is a sockpuppet of a blocked user. Please provide evidence here,

JK (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mammootty. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 07:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Jayakrishnan.ks100
Hello I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kunchacko Boban. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. Indian film 100yrs of mkht (talk) 08:18, 26 September 2013‎ (UTC)

I don't know who is this onam2013. today i created a account till yesterday i am editing with my IP. The administrators warn me so that i creat a account. you can check my IP and his IP if both are same administrators can block me. so remove my acount from there. Indian film 100yrs of mkht (talk) 08:43, 26 September 2013‎ (UTC)

next steps
besides ignoring the absurd "warning", the sock investigation is requesting more evidence. if you could pull together some additional diffs that would be great. once the clown is blocked, we need to request WP:RPP page protection. the disruption has gone on for so long on the article about a living person that they are likely to give a good level. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  09:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm Jnraj, I made changes based on the details provided in the celebrity's official Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/Nazriya4u/info. However I couldn't add this in reference. Thanks —Preceding undated comment added 12:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Editing Manjari Page
Dear Mr.Jaykrishnan

I would like to extend my deep felt gratitude for the interest you are showing in editing the website of Manjari singer Page. Here are a few requests. Kindly visit www.manjari.co and subsequent pages and update the wiki page so that it appears more current. Manjari has sung for many more music directors and has more than 200 songs to her credit. you can find the links to all her songs in the website music section. Since you are the sole person undoing everything others put up in wikipedia citing reasons that are ridiculous (to me)....it will be best if you spent time 'doing' things rather than 'undoing'.

Thank you Regards lion105. Lion105 (talk) 11:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Muvattupuzha article
Hi, you have removed some parts of the article contributed by me citing it as "opinion"(which is OK). however, the point about Perumattam Dasukhi masjid and the old famous sufi saint Valyuppappa is a fact and I am searching online sources for citation. meantime, I am adding Perumattom masjid details in the relevent section of Muvattupuzha article. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.230.235.132 (talk) 04:27, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)